Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860034›Full record

ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2022

Modular micro-PCR system for the onsite rapid diagnosis of COVID-19.

Phuong Quoc Mai Nguyen, Ming Wang, Nelisha Ann Maria, Adelicia Yongling Li, Hsih Yin Tan, Gordon Minru Xiong, Meng-Kwang Marcus Tan, Ali Asgar S Bhagat, Catherine W M Ong, Chwee Teck Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Multiplexed CRISPR-based Methods for Pathogen Nucleic Acid Detection.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Modular microfluidics for life sciences.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Phuong Quoc Mai NguyenInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, MD6, 14 Medical Drive #14-01, Singapore, 117599 Singapore.
Ming WangInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, MD6, 14 Medical Drive #14-01, Singapore, 117599 Singapore.
Nelisha Ann MariaInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, MD6, 14 Medical Drive #14-01, Singapore, 117599 Singapore.
Adelicia Yongling LiInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, MD6, 14 Medical Drive #14-01, Singapore, 117599 Singapore.
Hsih Yin TanInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, MD6, 14 Medical Drive #14-01, Singapore, 117599 Singapore.
Gordon Minru XiongInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, MD6, 14 Medical Drive #14-01, Singapore, 117599 Singapore.
Meng-Kwang Marcus TanAdvanced MedTech, 2 Venture Drive, #23-18 Vision Exchange, Singapore, 608526 Singapore.
Ali Asgar S BhagatInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, MD6, 14 Medical Drive #14-01, Singapore, 117599 Singapore.
Catherine W M OngInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, MD6, 14 Medical Drive #14-01, Singapore, 117599 Singapore.
Chwee Teck LimInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, MD6, 14 Medical Drive #14-01, Singapore, 117599 Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective containment of the COVID-19 pandemic requires rapid and accurate detection of the pathogen. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) remains the gold standard for COVID-19 confirmation. In this article, we report the performance of a cost-effective modular microfluidic reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and RT-loop mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) platform, Epidax®, for the point-of-care testing and confirmation of SARS-CoV-2. This platform is versatile and can be reconfigured either for screening using endpoint RT-PCR or RT-LAMP tests or for confirmatory tests using real-time RT-PCR. Epidax® is highly sensitive and detects as little as 1 RNA copy per µL for real-time and endpoint RT-PCR, while using only half of the reagents. We achieved comparable results with those of a commercial platform when detecting SARS-CoV-2 viruses from 81 clinical RNA extracts. Epidax® can also detect SARS-CoV-2 from 44 nasopharyngeal samples without RNA extraction by using a direct RT-PCR assay, which shortens the sample-to-answer time to an hour with minimal user steps. Furthermore, we validated the technology using an RT-LAMP assay on 54 clinical RNA extracts. Overall, our platform provides a sensitive, cost-effective, and accurate diagnostic solution for low-resource settings.

Indexed as

ChemistryElectrical and electronic engineering

Identifiers

PMID35860034
PMCPMC9294789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.