Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860028›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Multi-Objective Drug Design Based on Graph-Fragment Molecular Representation and Deep Evolutionary Learning.

Muhetaer Mukaidaisi, Andrew Vu, Karl Grantham, Alain Tchagang, Yifeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Extremely Randomized Trees to Determine Binding Affinity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. AI-Driven Polypharmacology in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhetaer MukaidaisiBiomedical Data Science Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Andrew VuBiomedical Data Science Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Karl GranthamBiomedical Data Science Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Alain TchagangScientific Data Mining Team, Digital Technologies Research Centre, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Yifeng LiBiomedical Data Science Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery is a challenging process with a huge molecular space to be explored and numerous pharmacological properties to be appropriately considered. Among various drug design protocols, fragment-based drug design is an effective way of constraining the search space and better utilizing biologically active compounds. Motivated by fragment-based drug search for a given protein target and the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in this field, this work advances the field of

Indexed as

deep evolutionary learningdrug designgraph fragmentationmulti-objective optimizationprotein-ligand binding affinityvariational autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID35860028
PMCPMC9291509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.