Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859970›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Trends in Inpatient Utilization of Head Computerized Tomography Scans in the United States: A Brief Cross-Sectional Study.

Ali Seifi, Seyedmohammad Jafari, Seyyedmohammadsadeq Mirmoeeni, Amirhossein Azari Jafari, Niyousha Naderi, Armin Safdarpour, Sepehr Seifi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali SeifiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Seyedmohammad JafariLife Sciences, McMaster University, Toronto, CAN.
Seyyedmohammadsadeq MirmoeeniMedical School, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, IRN.
Amirhossein Azari JafariMedical School, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, IRN.
Niyousha NaderiMedical School, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Armin SafdarpourGlobal Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Sepehr SeifiBiomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Although computed tomography (CT) has revolutionized the field of medicine due to its incredible diagnostic capabilities, the trends regarding the usage of CT scans, especially in the field of neuroscience, are not very clear. We aim to find the trends in the usage of inpatient head CT scans in the United States using a robust database.  Methods We queried the national inpatient usage of head CT scans in the United States from 1997 to 2014 using a robust national database. The trends in usage were analyzed based on age, gender, insurance types, and patients' income.  Results During the study period, we recorded a total of 5,309,329 head CT scans, of which 51% were female. The total number of head CT scans in the United States dropped significantly from 527,026 cases to 181,095 cases (p=0.000). The decrease was with a steep slope from 1997 to 2002, and since then the decreasing slope turned to a steady state. The decrease in head CT scans was significant in all age groups (p = 0.001), more significant in uninsured payers (-79.4%, p=0.000), and prominent in low-income patients (-70.5 %, p=0.000). Conclusions Our study showed that national inpatient usage of CT scans of the head significantly decreased during the past two decades. This decrease is presumably multifactorial: reducing the number of unnecessary radiations, increased appropriateness audits by the government, payers' payment reductions, and integrated electronic platforms.

Indexed as

computerized tomography scanhcup-nishead cthealthcare utilizationimaging utilization trend

Identifiers

PMID35859970
PMCPMC9288580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.