ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Entrustable Professional Activities for Chinese Standardized Residency Training in Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Entrustable professional activities in medical education: strategies and results - a systematic review.Medical education online · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating UpToDate with case-based learning enhances residents' clinical decision-making and training satisfaction in critical care training.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Standardized training assessment of residents in obstetrics and gynecology on entrustable professional activities.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Entrustable professional activities for pediatric and subspecialties residency training in China.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Fit for Service: Preparing Residents for Neurointensive Care with Entrustable Professional Activities: A Delphi Study.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) were first introduced by Olle ten Cate in 2005. Since then, hundreds of applications in medical research have been reported worldwide. However, few studies discuss the use of EPAs for residency training in pediatric intensive care medicine. We conducted a pilot study of EPA for pediatric intensive care medicine to evaluate the use of EPAs in this subspecialty. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was implemented in pediatric intensive care medicine standardized residency training at the Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. An electronic survey assessing EPA performance using eight scales composed of 15 categories were distributed among residents and directors. Results: A total of 217 director-assessment and 44 residents' self-assessment questionnaires were collected, both demonstrating a rising trend in scores across postgraduate years. There were significant differences in PGY1-vs.-PGY2 and PGY1-vs.-PGY3 director-assessment scores, while there were no differences in PGY2-vs.-PGY3 scores. PGY had a significant effect on the score of each EPA, while position significantly affected the scores of all EPAs except for EPA1 (Admit a patient) and EPA2 (Select and interpret auxiliary examinations). Gender only significantly affected the scores of EPA6 (Report a case), EPA12 (Perform health education), and EPA13 (Inform bad news). Conclusion: This study indicates that EPA assessments have a certain discriminating capability among different PGYs in Chinese standardized residency training in pediatric intensive care medicine. Postgraduate year, gender, and resident position affected EPA scores to a certain extent. Given the inconsistency between resident-assessed and director-assessed scores, an improved feedback program is needed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.