Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859920›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Belgian Society of Radiology2022

Comparison of Initial CT Findings and CO-RADS Stage in COVID-19 Patients with PCR, Inflammation and Coagulation Parameters in Diagnostic and Prognostic Perspectives.

Elif Yıldırım Ayaz, Zafer Ünsal Coşkun, Mustafa Kaplan, Ahmet Sait Bulut, Melike Yeşildal, Handan Ankaralı, Gökhan Uygun, Özge Telci Çaklılı, Mehmet Uzunlulu, Haluk Vahaboğlu and 1 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elif Yıldırım AyazUniversity of Health Sciences Sultan 2. Abdülhamid Training and Research Hospital, Internal Medicine Clinic, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2404-8784
Zafer Ünsal CoşkunUniversity of Health Sciences Sultan 2. Abdülhamid Training and Research Hospital, Department of Radiology, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-3001
Mustafa KaplanUniversity of Health Sciences Sultan 2. Abdülhamid Training and Research Hospital, Internal Medicine Clinic, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0354-4762
Ahmet Sait BulutSancaktepe Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-8631
Melike YeşildalUniversity of Health Sciences Sultan 2. Abdülhamid Training and Research Hospital, Department of Radiology, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4341-6076
Handan AnkaralıIstanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3613-0523
Gökhan UygunGöztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Internal Medicine Clinic, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4776-7976
Özge Telci ÇaklılıIstanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology Clinic, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-5427
Mehmet UzunluluGöztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Internal Medicine Clinic, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8754-1069
Haluk VahaboğluDr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Infectious Disease Clinic, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-1767
Ali Rıza OdabaşUniversity of Health Sciences Sultan 2. Abdülhamid Training and Research Hospital, TR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9007-7930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to determine whether COVID-19 patients with different initial reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), computed tomography (CT) and laboratory findings have different clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this multi-center retrospective cohort study, 895 hospitalized patients with the diagnosis of COVID-19 were included. According to the RT-PCR positivity and presence of CT findings, the patients were divided into four groups. These groups were compared in terms of mortality and need for intensive care unit (ICU). According to the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS), all patients' CT images were staged. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between CO-RADS and predictive inflammation and coagulation parameters. Results: RT-PCR test positivity was 51.5%, the CT finding was 70.7%, and 49.7% of the patients were in the CO-RADS 5 stage. The need for ICU and mortality rates was higher in the group with only CT findings compared to the group with only RT-PCR positivity, (14.9% vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001; 9.3% vs. 3.3%, p > 0.05; respectively). Mortality was 3.27 times higher in patients with CO-RADS 4 compared to those with CO-RADS 1-2. Being in the CO-RADS 4 stage and LDH were discovered to be the most efficient parameters in determining mortality risk. Conclusion: Performing only the RT-PCR test in the initial evaluation of patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection may lead to overlooking groups that are more at risk for severe disease. The use of a chest CT to perform CO-RADS staging would be beneficial in terms of providing both diagnostic and prognostic information.

Indexed as

chestcomputerized tomographyCO-RADSCOVID-19mortalitySARS-CoV2 RT-PCR testing

Identifiers

PMID35859920
PMCPMC9266850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.