ReviewPaediatrics & child health2022
Genetic testing and screening in children.
Review in Paediatrics & child health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parent/caregiver needs during pediatric genome-wide sequencing: A scoping literature review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Understanding the decision of parents to opt-out of medically actionable secondary findings offered through genome sequencing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Diagnostic yield and genetic landscape of rare pediatric diseases in Vietnam identified by exome sequencing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Next-generation sequencing in pediatric-onset epilepsies: Analysis with target panels and personalized therapeutic approach.Epilepsia open · 2024Observational
- Imprinting disorders.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Arguments for and against the whole-genome sequencing of newborns.American journal of translational research · 2023Review
- Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic testing has progressed rapidly over the past two decades and is becoming common in paediatrics. This statement provides an overview of recent developments that may impact genetic testing in children. Genetics is a rapidly evolving field, and this statement focuses specifically on expanded newborn screening, next generation sequencing (NGS), incidental findings, direct-to-consumer testing, histocompatibility testing, and genetic testing in a research context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.