Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859653›Full record

ArticleConference record. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers2018

Competing inhibition-stabilized networks in sensory and memory processing.

Benjamin S Lankow, Mark S Goldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conference record. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin S LankowCenter for Neuroscience, University of California at Davis, Davis, USA.
Mark S GoldmanDept of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California at Davis, Davis, USA.

Funding

Subcortical Neural Coding and DynamicsU19NS104648 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TANK, DAVID W · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Persistent Activity in a Neural IntegratorR01EY027036 · NEI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Emre R Aksay, MARK S GOLDMAN · 2016 to 2026
$6.4M
Prenatal Development of Visual SystemR01EY016182 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI USREY, W MARTIN · 2005 to 2014
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016182NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027036NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In simplified models of neocortical circuits, inhibition is either modeled in a feedforward manner or through mutual inhibitory interactions that provide for competition between neuronal populations. By contrast, recent work has suggested a critical role for recurrent inhibition as a negative feedback element that stabilizes otherwise unstable recurrent excitation. Here, we show how models based upon a motif of recurrently connected "E-I" pairs of excitatory and inhibitory units can be used to describe experimental observations in sensory and memory networks. In a sensory network model of binocular rivalry, a model based on competing E-I motifs captures psychophysical observations about how incongruous images presented to the two eyes compete. In a model of cortical working memory, an architecturally similar model with modified synaptic time constants can mathematically accumulate signals into a working memory buffer in a manner that is robust to the abrupt removal of cells. These results suggest the inhibition-stabilized E-I motif as a fundamental building block for models of a wide array of neocortical dynamics.

Indexed as

E-I motifintegratormemorynegative feedbackneural networkrivalry

Identifiers

PMID35859653
PMCPMC9293748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.