ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2022
Aligning the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) histology groupings with current definitions.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The relationship between asthma and glioma: a case-control study in a universal access healthcare system.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2018-2022.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- CBTRUS Statistical Report: Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Childhood and Adolescent Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2017-2021.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Response Assessment in Long-Term Glioblastoma Survivors Using a Multiparametric MRI-Based Prediction Model.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Integration of histopathological image features and multi-dimensional omics data in predicting molecular features and survival in glioblastoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2017-2021.Neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Childhood, adolescent, and adult primary brain and central nervous system tumor statistics for practicing healthcare providers in neuro-oncology, CBTRUS 2015-2019.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Review
- CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2016-2020.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2015-2019.Neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States Histopathological Grouping Scheme Provides Clinically Relevant Brain and Other Central Nervous System Categories for Cancer Registry Data.Journal of registry management · 2022Article
- A Telerobotic System for Transnasal Surgery.IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics : a joint publication of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society and the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division · 2013Article
- Article
- Long-term survivors of glioblastoma: Tumor molecular, clinical, and imaging findings.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) uses a histology grouping model based on the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications to group records for clinically relevant statistical reporting. Newly identified genetic markers more accurately stratify patients than histology alone and were incorporated into the 2016 update to the WHO Classification. Methods: CBTRUS and consulting neuropathologists reviewed and aligned histology groupings with the 2016 WHO update. "Obsolete" (terms not currently in use) histology nomenclature along with their International Classification of Disease, Oncology 3rd edition (ICD-O-3) codes were identified, some histologies were reclassified to 2016 WHO, and new codes found in 2016 WHO were incorporated. An evaluation of the frequency of histology codes affected in the realignment process, and incidence and survival pre- and post-realignment was conducted. Results: After review, 67 codes were noted as obsolete, 51 codes were reclassified, and 12 new codes were incorporated. Histology groups most affected were mesenchymal tumors and neuronal/mixed neuronal-glial tumors. Reorganization resulted in 2588 (0.65%) cases with grouping reassignment or reporting change, indicating that the 2016 WHO Classification revision has impacted the collection and reporting of primary brain and other CNS tumors. Conclusion: This work demonstrates the need to be responsive to changes in classification and coding in order to ensure the most up-to-date and accurate statistics for brain and CNS tumors. This will require collaboration from all stakeholders within the brain tumor community, so to have the ability to reconcile clinical practices and surveillance requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.