Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859228›Full record

Observational studyDrugs & aging2022

Drug Survival, Safety, and Effectiveness of Biologics in Older Patients with Psoriasis: A Comparison with Younger Patients-A BioCAPTURE Registry Study.

E L M Ter Haar, S E Thomas, J M P A van den Reek, M E Otero, M D Njoo, P M Ossenkoppele, E N Kop, S R P Dodemont, J E M Körver, A L A Kuijpers and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Drugs & aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

E L M Ter Haar *Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Elke.terHaar@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9874-4670
S E Thomas *Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1343-353X
J M P A van den ReekDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3642-2673
M E OteroDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-3293
M D NjooDepartment of Dermatology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo/Hengelo, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1424-5722
P M OssenkoppeleDepartment of Dermatology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo/Hengelo, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7311-7213
E N KopDepartment of Dermatology, Bernhoven Ziekenhuis, Uden, The Netherlands.
S R P DodemontDepartment of Dermatology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-5925
J E M KörverDepartment of Dermatology, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, The Netherlands.
A L A KuijpersDepartment of Dermatology, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7874-1165
R J LindhoutDepartment of Dermatology, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
R A TupkerDepartment of Dermatology, St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2378-3741
J M MommersDepartment of Dermatology, Anna Ziekenhuis, Geldrop, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4930-4107
M A M BerendsDepartment of Dermatology, Slingeland Ziekenhuis, Doetinchem, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3851-1407
M I A KoetsierDepartment of Dermatology, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7823-8380
M S de Bruin-WellerDepartment of Dermatology, Utrecht Medisch Centrum, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-6993
M B VischDepartment of Dermatology, Ziekenhuis Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6265-3830
W P ArnoldDepartment of Dermatology, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-7825
P P M van LümigDepartment of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6619-0853
M M KleinpenningDepartment of Dermatology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
S F K LubeekDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2694-6059
E M G J de JongDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3872-5704
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLGelre Hospitals · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLSlingeland Ziekenhuis · NLSt. Anna Ziekenhuis · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsoriasis is a common inflammatory disease in any age group, but also in older patients (≥ 65 years of age). Since older patients are often excluded from clinical trials, limited data specifically on this growing population are available, e.g. regarding the safety and performance of biological treatment.

aimsWe aimed to give insight into this specific population by comparing the drug survival and safety of biologics in older patients with that in younger patients.

methodsIn this real-world observational study, data from 3 academic and 15 non-academic centers in The Netherlands were extracted from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry. Biologics included in this study were tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors. Patients were divided into two age groups: ≥ 65 years and < 65 years. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to measure comorbid disease status, and all adverse events (AEs) that led to treatment discontinuation were classified according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification. All AEs that led to treatment discontinuation were studied to check whether they could be classified as serious AEs (SAEs). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall 5-year drug survival and split according to reasons of discontinuation (ineffectiveness or AEs) were constructed. Cox regression models were used to correct for possible confounders and to investigate associations with drug survival in both age groups separately. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores during the first 2 years of treatment and at the time of treatment discontinuation were assessed and compared between age groups.

resultsA total of 890 patients were included, of whom 102 (11.4%) were aged ≥ 65 years. Body mass index, sex, and distribution of biologic classes (e.g. TNFα, IL12/23) were not significantly different between the two age groups. A significantly higher CCI score was found in older patients, indicative of more comorbidity (p < 0.001). The 5-year ineffectiveness-related drug survival was lower for older patients (44.5% vs. 60.5%; p = 0.006), and the 5-year overall (≥ 65 years: 32.4% vs. < 65 years: 42.1%; p = 0.144) and AE-related (≥ 65 years: 82.1% vs. < 65 years: 79.5%; p = 0.913) drug survival was comparable between age groups. Of all AEs (n = 155) that led to discontinuation, 16 (10.3%) were reported as SAEs but these only occurred in younger patients. After correcting for confounders, the same trends were observed in the drug survival outcomes. Linear regression analyses on PASI scores showed no statistical differences at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment between age groups.

conclusionsThis study in a substantial, well-defined, prospective cohort provides further support that the use of biologics in older patients seems well-tolerated and effective. Biologic discontinuation due to AEs did not occur more frequently in older patients. Older patients discontinued biologic treatment more often due to ineffectiveness, although no clear difference in PASI scores was observed. More real-world studies on physician- and patient-related factors in older patients are warranted.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsPsoriasisAgedHumansProspective StudiesRegistriesTreatment OutcomeBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID35859228
PMCPMC9300332
OpenAlexW4285999505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.