Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859154›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Development of a rapid in vitro pre-screen for distinguishing effective liposome-adjuvant delivery systems.

Laura A J Feather, Vinod Nadella, Elisabeth Kastner, Yvonne Perrie, Anthony C Hilton, Andrew Devitt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Evaluation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Preparation and in vitro Immunoreactivity ofIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura A J FeatherCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Vinod NadellaCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Elisabeth KastnerCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Yvonne PerrieStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, 161 Cathedral St, Glasgow, G4 0RE, Scotland.
Anthony C HiltonCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew DevittCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK. a.devitt1@aston.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4651-6761
Aston University · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/L000261/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/N002466/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liposomes are a strong supporting tool in vaccine technology, as they are a versatile system that not only act as antigen delivery systems but also adjuvants that can be highly effective at stimulating both innate and adaptive immune responses. Their ability to induce cell-mediated immunity makes their use in vaccines a useful tool in the development of novel, more effective vaccines against intracellular infections (e.g. HIV, malaria and tuberculosis). Currently, screening of novel liposome formulations uses murine in vivo models which generate data that often correlates poorly with human data. In addition, these models are both high cost and low throughput, making them prohibitive for large scale screening of formulation libraries. This study uses the cationic liposome formulation DDA:TDB (known as cationic adjuvant formulation 01 (CAF01)), as a lead formulation, along with other liposome formulations of known in vivo efficacy to develop an in vitro screening tool for liposome formulation development. THP-1-derived macrophages were the model antigen presenting cell used to assess the ability of the liposome formulations to attract, associate with and activate antigen presenting cells in vitro, crucial steps necessary for an effective immune response to antigen. By using a combination of in vitro functions, the study highlights the potential use of an in vitro screening tool, to predict the in vivo efficacy of novel liposome formulations. CAF01 was predicted as the most effective liposome formulation when assessing all in vitro functions and a measure of in vitro activation was able to predict 80% of the liposome correctly for their ability to induce an in vivo IFN-ү response.

Indexed as

LiposomesVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAnimalsAntigensCationsHumansImmunity, HumoralMiceQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAntigensCationsLiposomesQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35859154
PMCPMC9299755
OpenAlexW4286009327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.