Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859140›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2022

Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED): a protocol for an implementation study in the Veterans Health Administration.

Mary Ersek, Anne Sales, Shimrit Keddem, Roman Ayele, Leah M Haverhals, Kate H Magid, Jennifer Kononowech, Andrew Murray, Joan G Carpenter, Mary Beth Foglia and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Mary ErsekCenter for Health Equity and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Annex Suite 203, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. ersekm@nursing.upenn.edu.
Anne SalesSinclair School of Nursing and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Shimrit KeddemCenter for Health Equity and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Annex Suite 203, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Roman AyeleRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Leah M HaverhalsRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kate H MagidRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jennifer KononowechCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Andrew MurrayCorporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joan G CarpenterCorporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mary Beth FogliaVA National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, D.C., USA.
Lucinda PotterVA National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, D.C., USA.
Jennifer McKenzieVA Purchased Long-Term Services and Supports, Geriatrics and Extended Care, D, Washington, .C, USA.
Darlene DavisHome-Based Primary Care Program, Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care, Washington, D.C., USA.
Cari LevyRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Washington · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative QUE-20-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpirical evidence supports the use of structured goals of care conversations and documentation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) preferences in durable, accessible, and actionable orders to improve the care for people living with serious illness. As the largest integrated healthcare system in the USA, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) provides an excellent environment to test implementation strategies that promote this evidence-based practice. The Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED) program seeks to improve care outcomes for seriously ill Veterans by supporting efforts to conduct goals of care conversations, systematically document LST preferences, and ensure timely and accurate communication about preferences across VA and non-VA settings.

methodsPERSIVED encompasses two separate but related implementation projects that support the same evidence-based practice. Project 1 will enroll 12 VA Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) programs and Project 2 will enroll six VA Community Nursing Home (CNH) programs. Both projects begin with a pre-implementation phase during which data from diverse stakeholders are gathered to identify barriers and facilitators to adoption of the LST evidence-based practice. This baseline assessment is used to tailor quality improvement activities using audit with feedback and implementation facilitation during the implementation phase. Site champions serve as the lynchpin between the PERSIVED project team and site personnel. PERSIVED teams support site champions through monthly coaching sessions. At the end of implementation, baseline site process maps are updated to reflect new steps and procedures to ensure timely conversations and documentation of treatment preferences. During the sustainability phase, intense engagement with champions ends, at which point champions work independently to maintain and improve processes and outcomes. Ongoing process evaluation, guided by the RE-AIM framework, is used to monitor Reach, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance outcomes. Effectiveness will be assessed using several endorsed clinical metrics for seriously ill populations. DISCUSSION: The PERSIVED program aims to prevent potentially burdensome LSTs by consistently eliciting and documenting values, goals, and treatment preferences of seriously ill Veterans. Working with clinical operational partners, we will apply our findings to HBPC and CNH programs throughout the national VA healthcare system during a future scale-out period.

Indexed as

Audit with feedbackEnd-of-life careFacilitationGoals of care conversationsImplementation scienceLife-sustaining treatmentLong-term carePatient decision-makingPatient preferences

Identifiers

PMID35859140
PMCPMC9296899
OpenAlexW4285900268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.