Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859120›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2023

Immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery: patient perceptions and preferences.

Jonathan Malcolm, Christopher Leak, Alexander C Day, Helen Baker, John C Buchan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06894017 (Patient Preferences on Same-day Bilateral Intravitreal Dexamethasone Injections), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06894017 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Patient Preferences on Same-day Bilateral Intravitreal Dexamethasone Injections

TypeobservationalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2025 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsInformed Consent, Preference, PatientArmsOzurdex (dexamethasone)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Recent trends and outcomes in immediate and delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgeries: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan MalcolmInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. jonathanpmalcolm@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4942-355X
Christopher LeakMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alexander C DayMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Helen BakerMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2916-9443
John C BuchanInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1005-7011
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent national data suggests that less than 0.5% of NHS cataract patients undergo immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS). Since ISBCS improves service efficiency, increasing its practice may help tackle the ever-growing burden of cataract in the UK, and reduce the COVID-19 cataract backlog. Surgeon attitudes are known to be a significant barrier to increasing the practice of ISBCS. However, little is known about patient perceptions of ISBCS.

methodsPatients at cataract clinics across three NHS hospital sites were recruited to complete an investigator-led structured questionnaire. Open-ended and closed-ended questions were used to assess awareness of ISBCS, willingness to undergo ISBCS and attitudes towards ISBCS.

resultsQuestionnaires were completed by 183 patients. Mean participant age was 70.5 (9.9) years and 58% were female. Forty-three percent were aware of ISBCS, chiefly via clinic staff. Just over a third would choose ISBCS if given the choice, and participants that perceived they were recommended ISBCS were more likely to opt for it. The most common motivator and barrier to uptake of ISBCS was convenience and the perceived risk of complications in both eyes respectively. Concerns related to the recovery period were common, including misunderstandings, such as the need to wear eye patches that obscure both eyes.

conclusionsOur study indicates that significantly more NHS patients would be willing to undergo ISBCS if given the choice. The reluctance of surgeons to recommend ISBCS and patient misunderstandings regarding the recovery period may be limiting its uptake.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionCOVID-19PhacoemulsificationAgedFemaleHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularMale

Identifiers

PMID35859120
PMCPMC9296758
OpenAlexW4285891401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.