ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Detection of coronavirus in tear samples of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates in tear secretions of inpatient COVID-positive individuals in an Indian tertiary care setting.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Ocular Lesions Related to COVID-19 and Its Vaccines.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Prevalence, Patterns, and Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and Culturable Virus in Tears of a Case-Ascertained Household Cohort.American journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Conditional reprogrammed human limbal epithelial cell model for anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug screening.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Incidence and clinical characteristic of ocular surface manifestation: an evaluation of conjunctival swab results in Corona Virus 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Jakarta, Indonesia.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2023Article
- Detection of Airborne Influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 Virus Shedding following Ocular Inoculation of Ferrets.Journal of virology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Primary Vaccination and Booster Dose to SARS-CoV-2 in Eliciting Stable Mucosal Immunity.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Exploring the Ocular Transmission Potential of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and the Assessment of Conjunctival Swab Test Results: A Concise Review.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the presence of viral RNA in conjunctival secretions and tears of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected patients in terms of a possible ocular transmission route and also to examine whether a difference between the patients with and without ocular surface positivity existed.
methodsA prospective cross-sectional study of 70 consecutive patients who were hospitalized in Haseki Training and Research Hospital with SARS-CoV-2 from February 1 to April 1, 2021, was performed. Tears and conjunctival secretions were collected within 24 h of nasopharyngeal sample collection and examined for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The clinical data, results of blood tests and nasopharyngeal and conjunctival swabs, and CT findings were evaluated for all patients.
resultsSeventy patients (37 males, 33 females) were included in this study. Tear-conjunctival samples from eight patients (11.42%) yielded positive PCR results although these eight patients had no eye symptoms or conjunctivitis. In patients with positive conjunctival PCR results, cycle threshold values for conjunctival samples were higher than those for nasopharyngeal samples. All findings (except gender) were similar between patients with either positive or negative conjunctival swab samples. All patients with positive conjunctival swab samples were male; however, the male ratio in patients with negative conjunctival swab samples was only 46.77%.
conclusionIn our study, the rate of conjunctival swab PCR positivity was 11.42%. It appears that even in the absence of ocular symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 virus may be present on the ocular surface; therefore, the ocular surface may be a significant viral transmission route.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.