Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859082›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023

Detection of coronavirus in tear samples of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Mine Ozturk, Deniz Kumova, Sema Alacam, Hatice Erdogan, Feyza Onder

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mine OzturkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Millet Street, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey. dr_mine@yahoo.com.
Deniz KumovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Millet Street, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sema AlacamDivision of Virology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hatice ErdoganDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Feyza OnderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Millet Street, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey.
Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the presence of viral RNA in conjunctival secretions and tears of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected patients in terms of a possible ocular transmission route and also to examine whether a difference between the patients with and without ocular surface positivity existed.

methodsA prospective cross-sectional study of 70 consecutive patients who were hospitalized in Haseki Training and Research Hospital with SARS-CoV-2 from February 1 to April 1, 2021, was performed. Tears and conjunctival secretions were collected within 24 h of nasopharyngeal sample collection and examined for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The clinical data, results of blood tests and nasopharyngeal and conjunctival swabs, and CT findings were evaluated for all patients.

resultsSeventy patients (37 males, 33 females) were included in this study. Tear-conjunctival samples from eight patients (11.42%) yielded positive PCR results although these eight patients had no eye symptoms or conjunctivitis. In patients with positive conjunctival PCR results, cycle threshold values for conjunctival samples were higher than those for nasopharyngeal samples. All findings (except gender) were similar between patients with either positive or negative conjunctival swab samples. All patients with positive conjunctival swab samples were male; however, the male ratio in patients with negative conjunctival swab samples was only 46.77%.

conclusionIn our study, the rate of conjunctival swab PCR positivity was 11.42%. It appears that even in the absence of ocular symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 virus may be present on the ocular surface; therefore, the ocular surface may be a significant viral transmission route.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSARS-CoV-2Conjunctival swabCOVID-19Nasopharyngeal swabSARS-CoV-2Tears

Identifiers

PMID35859082
PMCPMC9299406
OpenAlexW4286008936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.