Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859057›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Thalamo-hippocampal pathway regulates incidental memory capacity in mice.

G Torromino, V Loffredo, D Cavezza, G Sonsini, F Esposito, A H Crevenna, M Gioffrè, M De Risi, A Treves, M Griguoli and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fear Synchrony of Mouse Dyads: Interaction of Sex Composition and Stress.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025
    Article
  5. Cell-Type Specific Circuits in the Mammillary Body for Place and Object Recognition Memory.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. High-THCeNeuro · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

G Torromino *Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Telethon Foundation, Pozzuoli (Naples), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7041-0289
V Loffredo *Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Telethon Foundation, Pozzuoli (Naples), Italy.
D CavezzaInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC), National Research Council, Monterotondo (Rome), Italy.
G SonsiniInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC), National Research Council, Monterotondo (Rome), Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7578-8929
F EspositoTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Telethon Foundation, Pozzuoli (Naples), Italy.
A H CrevennaNeurobiology and Epigenetics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Monterotondo (Rome), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5580-3711
M GioffrèInstitute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems (ISASI), National Research Council, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5618-7922
M De RisiTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Telethon Foundation, Pozzuoli (Naples), Italy.
A TrevesSISSA - Cognitive Neuroscience, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-5673
M GriguoliEuropean Brain Research Institute (EBRI), Rome, Italy.
E De LeonibusTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Telethon Foundation, Pozzuoli (Naples), Italy. deleonibus@tigem.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0220-2864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incidental memory can be challenged by increasing either the retention delay or the memory load. The dorsal hippocampus (dHP) appears to help with both consolidation from short-term (STM) to long-term memory (LTM), and higher memory loads, but the mechanism is not fully understood. Here we find that female mice, despite having the same STM capacity of 6 objects and higher resistance to distraction in our different object recognition task (DOT), when tested over 1 h or 24 h delays appear to transfer to LTM only 4 objects, whereas male mice have an STM capacity of 6 objects in this task. In male mice the dHP shows greater activation (as measured by c-Fos expression), whereas female mice show greater activation of the ventral midline thalamus (VMT). Optogenetic inhibition of the VMT-dHP pathway during off-line memory consolidation enables 6-object LTM retention in females, while chemogenetic VMT-activation impairs it in males. Thus, removing or enhancing sub-cortical inhibitory control over the hippocampus leads to differences in incidental memory.

Indexed as

Memory ConsolidationMemory, Short-TermAnimalsFemaleHippocampusInhibition, PsychologicalMaleMemory, Long-TermMice

Identifiers

PMID35859057
PMCPMC9300669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.