ArticleDysphagia2023
Endoscopic Stricturotomy in the Treatment of Refractory Esophageal Anastomotic Strictures.
Article in Dysphagia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Efficacy of Repeated Endoscopic Incision Combined with Triamcinolone Injection in Patients with Recurrent Benign Esophageal Stricture.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Endoscopic remodeling of esophageal stenosis refractory to traditional endoscopic treatment.JPGN reports · 2025Article
- Case Report: Successful application of endoscopic biliary accessories in a patient with complete esophageal stricture.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures are a frequent challenge for endoscopists. The current therapeutic strategies have a significant restenosis rate, and patients usually require repeated sessions and suffer from dysphagia. Therefore, we propose a modified method named endoscopic stricturotomy (ES) to treat refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures. The patients diagnosed with refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures were enrolled in the cohort study. The method of ES is to incise longitudinally only a single strip of mucosa at the most prominent part of fibrotic scar and completely cut fibrotic tissues under the mucosa. The primary endpoint was the times of endoscopic therapies. The secondary endpoints include the effective rate, success rate, recurrence rate, endoscopic treatment intervals, complications, length of hospital stay, and surgical cost. The patients were followed up for at least 6 months after ES. The median anastomotic diameter of 12 patients was 2 mm (range 1 to 4 mm). Dysphagia were dramatically relieved in all patients (dysphagia grade from 3 to 1), the effective rate was 100%. During the follow-up, the 12 patients received a total number of 38 sessions, and the median number of ES sessions was 2.5 (1-9), and the success rate were 83%. Nine of the patients (75%) developed restenosis during follow-up, with a median interval of 38 days (15-315 days). No complications occurred during treatment and following up. The median hospital stay was 2 days (2-2.9 days), and the hospitalization costs was 3887.4 RMB (3632.8 RMB-4116.9 RMB). ES seems to be an effective treatment modality for refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures. Large prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm its utility and its place in the management of refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures (ChiCTR2000032997).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.