ArticleNeurology and therapy2022
Physician-Reported Perspectives on Myasthenia Gravis in the United States: A Real-World Survey.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dyslipidemia in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Improvement of fatigue in generalised myasthenia gravis with zilucoplan.Journal of neurology · 2024Trial
- Real-world Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis in the United States.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Treatment Preferences of Patients With Myasthenia Gravis: A Qualitative Study.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Incremental health care resource utilization, costs, and predictors of high costs in generalized myasthenia gravis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Burden of Disease in Myasthenia Gravis: A Targeted Literature Review.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators in Care and Rehabilitation of Adults with Myasthenia Gravis in Neurological Departments in Denmark.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Mental Health Experiences and Challenges Among Individuals with Myasthenia Gravis: Insights from Patient-Centered, Qualitative Analyses.Advances in therapy · 2025Review
- Persistent symptoms, exacerbations and drug side effects despite treatment in myasthenia gravis.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Racial disparities in acute care utilization among individuals with myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Predictors of High Healthcare Cost Among Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Combined Machine Learning and Regression Approach from a US Payer Perspective.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Article
- The impact of diagnosis delay on European patients with generalised myasthenia gravis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Article
- Patient perceptions of disease burden and treatment of myasthenia gravis based on sentiment analysis of digital conversations.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Physician- and patient-reported perspectives on myasthenia gravis in Europe: a real-world survey.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Impact of social determinants of health on individuals living with generalized myasthenia gravis and implications for patient support programs.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMyasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, debilitating, chronic disorder caused by the production of pathogenic immunoglobulin G autoantibodies against the neuromuscular junction. A lack of real-world studies in rare diseases reflects a relatively limited understanding of the significant unmet needs and burden of disease for patients. We aimed to provide comprehensive real-world insights into the management and burden of MG from treating physicians in the United States (US).
methodsData were collected using the Adelphi Real World MG Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of physicians and their patients with MG, in the US between March and July 2020. Physician-reported clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, disease history, treatments, and healthcare resource utilization, were collected.
resultsIn total, 456 patient record forms were completed by 78 physicians based in the US. At time of survey completion, patient mean age was 54.5 years. Mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 9.0 months (n = 357). Ocular symptoms were reported in 71.7% of patients. General fatigue affected 47.1% of patients and over half of those reported the severity as moderate or severe (59.5%, n = 128). Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and/or steroids were the most frequently prescribed first-line treatment type among patients receiving treatment at time of survey completion and with moderate-to-severe symptoms (77.9%, n = 159/204). High-dose steroids (n = 14) and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 13) were the most prescribed acute treatments among those receiving an acute treatment at time of survey completion (n = 36), with symptom exacerbations or myasthenic crises being the most common reasons for acute treatment. On average, 2.5 healthcare professionals were involved in patient management and 5.0 consultations were made per patient over the last 12 months.
conclusionsOur findings indicated that, despite treatment, there is a proportion of patients with MG in the US who had a significant need for improved disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.