Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859030›Full record

Observational studyHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2022

Endoscopic transversus abdominis release in the treatment of midline incisional hernias: a prospective single-center observational study on 100 patients.

V Burdakov, A Zverev, N Matveev

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interparietal hernias after posterior component separation.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

V BurdakovVoskresensk City Hospital No 2, 2A Grazhdanskaya Str., Voskresensk, Moscow Region, 140203, Russia. vladburdakov86@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4032-6035
A ZverevVoskresensk City Hospital No 2, 2A Grazhdanskaya Str., Voskresensk, Moscow Region, 140203, Russia.
N MatveevDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Surgery of Biomedical Faculty, Chair, Pirogov Russian Research Scientific Medical University, 1 Ostrovityanova Str., Moscow, 117997, Russia.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University · RUVodafone (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor W2-3 incisional hernias of the midline, a component separation is often needed to achieve closure of the fascia during repair with a mesh. Posterior component separation has been initially performed via open surgical approach, but more recently interest in minimally invasive reconstruction has grown. The aim of this work is to describe the technical aspects of endoscopic hernia repair with posterior component separation and to assess its feasibility in midline incisional hernias, based on the analysis of the results.

methodsWe prospectively evaluated and analyzed patients with midline incisional hernias who underwent endoscopic posterior component separation by transversus abdominis release (TAR).

resultsA group of 100 patients was operated between April 2017 and September 2021. The median follow-up was 27 ± 13.5 months, mean age 59 ± 10.2 years, ASA 2.5 ± 0.7; 94% of patients had comorbidity. There were 7 (7%) complications observed in the early postoperative period-retromuscular hematoma (1), infection of the retromuscular space (4), and thrombophlebitis of superficial veins (2). In 4 (4%) patients, late complications were observed-persistent seroma (3) and chronic pain (1). There were no hernia recurrences in the follow-up period.

conclusionThe use of TAR endoscopic separation can reduce the number of unfavorable surgical site events, compared to the published data on a similar open surgery, while maintaining a low recurrence rate.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaAbdominal MusclesAgedHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshEndoscopic posterior component separation techniqueeTEPIncisional herniaTransversus abdominis muscle release (TAR)

Identifiers

PMID35859030
OpenAlexW4286005586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.