Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35859019›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2023

Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a review of efficacy and safety.

Eugene Lee, Joon Woo Lee, Heung Sik Kang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Eugene LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, 13620, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Joon Woo LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, 13620, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. joonwoo2@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7106-5229
Heung Sik KangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, 13620, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Seoul National University · KRNew Generation University College · ET

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2020R1F1A1060936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spine intervention is an important treatment option for the management of spinal pain, and the numbers of the most representative epidural steroid injection (ESI) procedures performed are expected to increase significantly in the future along with increased life expectancy and the increasing prevalence of spinal disorders. Therefore, it is important to understand the efficacy of ESIs according to each spinal disorder they are administered to treat, and one must be familiar with the possible complications. In fact, although numerous ESI-related articles have been published, there is still considerable controversy regarding the efficacy of ESI procedures. Furthermore, due to the rarity of serious complications, most instances have been recorded in the form of case reports. In this article, we aimed to review the indications of cervical and lumbar ESIs and to compare interlaminar ESI (ILESI) and transforaminal ESI (TFESI) techniques in terms of analgesic efficacy, possible complications, and safety profiles. This article includes opinions based on the authors' experience with ESI indications and efficacy, and presents practical tips for coping with specific situations related to each complication. By combining the dedicated anatomical understanding of radiologists with image-guided interventions, ESI is expected to stand out in the rapidly expanding field of spine intervention.

Indexed as

Low Back PainSpinal DiseasesHumansInjections, EpiduralLumbosacral RegionPain ManagementSteroidsSteroidsEfficacyEpiduralInjectionsSafetySpine

Identifiers

PMID35859019
OpenAlexW4286209195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.