Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858999›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network.

Zhe Li, Jiayu Yang, Xinghua Li, Kunzheng Wang, Jungang Han, Pei Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhe Li *Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Jiayu Yang *School of Computer, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an, 710121, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Xinghua LiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Kunzheng WangDepartment of Bone and Joint Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Jungang HanSchool of Computer, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an, 710121, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China. hjg@xupt.edu.cn.
Pei YangDepartment of Bone and Joint Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China. yangpei@xjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate measurement of the femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) is of great significance for diagnosing hip joint diseases and preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty. However, the repeatability of manual measurements is not as satisfactory, and the difference between 2D and 3D measurements is not clear. The computer-aided method provides a platform for automatic and accurate measurement of the NSA. The femoral point cloud datasets from 310 subjects were segmented into three regions, including the femoral head, femoral neck, and femoral shaft using PointNet++. We created a projection plane to simulate the hip anteroposterior radiograph and fitted the femoral neck axis and femoral shaft axis to complete the 2D measurement, while we directly fitted the two axes in space to complete the 3D measurement. Also, we conducted the manual measurement of the NSA. We verified the accuracy of the segmentation and compared the results of the two automatic and manual methods. The Dice coefficient of femoral segmentation reached 0.9746, and MIoU of that was 0.9165. No significant difference was found between any two of the three methods. While comparing the 2D and 3D methods, the average accuracy was 98.00%, and the average error was 2.58°. This paper proposed two accurate and automatic methods to measure the NSA based on a 2D plane and a 3D model respectively. Although the femoral neck and femoral shaft axes did not intersect in 3D space, the NSAs obtained by 2D and 3D methods were basically consistent.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipOsteoarthritis, HipChest PainFemurFemur HeadFemur NeckHumans

Identifiers

PMID35858999
PMCPMC9300576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.