Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858978›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comparison of entomological impacts of two methods of intervention designed to control Anopheles gambiae s.l. via swarm killing in Western Burkina Faso.

Simon P Sawadogo, Abdoulaye Niang, Sean L Wu, Azize A Millogo, Jane Bonds, Mark Latham, Roch K Dabiré, Allison Tatarsky, Frederic Tripet, Abdoulaye Diabaté

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simon P SawadogoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de La Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. sawsimp2005@yahoo.fr.
Abdoulaye NiangInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de La Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Sean L WuDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Azize A MillogoInstitut de Sciences Des Sociétés (INSS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Jane BondsBonds Consulting Group LLC, Florida, USA.
Mark LathamManatee County Mosquito Control, Florida, USA.
Roch K DabiréInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de La Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Allison TatarskyMalaria Elimination Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Frederic TripetCentre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Abdoulaye DiabatéInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de La Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outdoor biting constitutes a major limitation of current vector control based primarily on long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying, both of which are indoor interventions. Consequently, malaria elimination will not be achieved unless additional tools are found to deal with the residual malaria transmission and the associated vector dynamics. In this study we tested a new vector control approach for rapidly crashing mosquito populations and disrupting malaria transmission in Africa. This method targets the previously neglected swarming and outdoor nocturnal behaviors of both male and female Anopheles mosquitoes. It involved accurate identification and targeted spraying of mosquito swarms to suppress adult malaria vector populations and their vectorial capacities. The impact of targeted spraying was compared to broadcast spraying and evaluated simultaneously. The effects of the two interventions were very similar, no significant differences between targeted spraying and broadcast spraying were found for effects on density, insemination or parity rate. However, targeted spraying was found to be significantly more effective than broadcast spraying at reducing the number of bites per person. As expected, each intervention had a highly significant impact upon all parameters measured, but the targeted swarm spraying required less insecticide.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesMalariaAnimalsBurkina FasoFemaleHumansMaleMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID35858978
PMCPMC9297277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.