Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858939›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

STEM learning communities promote friendships but risk academic segmentation.

Wesley Jeffrey, David R Schaefer, Di Xu, Peter McPartlan, Sabrina Solanki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wesley JeffreyDepartment of Sociology, University of California-Irvine, 4215 Social Science Plaza B, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA. wesley.jeffrey@uci.edu.
David R SchaeferDepartment of Sociology, University of California-Irvine, 4215 Social Science Plaza B, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Di XuDepartment of Education, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Peter McPartlanDepartment of Education, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Sabrina SolankiDivision of Teaching Excellence and Innovation, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universities are increasingly using learning communities (LCs) to promote the academic and social integration of entering students, especially within STEM majors. Examining the causal effect of LCs on student networks is necessary to understand the nature and scope of their impact. This study combines a regression discontinuity design with social network analysis to estimate the effect of a simple LC design on the size, strength, structure, and composition of friendship networks among students within the same biological sciences freshman cohort. Results of the quasi-experimental analysis indicate that LC participants acquired one additional friend in the major and increased their share of friends in the LC by 54 percentage-points. Exponential random-graph models that test mediation and alternative friendship mechanisms provide support for the theoretical argument that the LC promoted friendship development by structuring opportunities for interaction through block-registration into courses. Thus, this study shows that even simple LCs can shape the development of friendships through relatively low-cost administrative means. The increased access to resources and support facilitated by the LC is likely beneficial for participating students. However, there is a potential downside when eligibility for participation is determined using academic metrics that separate the student population into distinct classroom environments.

Indexed as

FriendsStudentsHumansLearningPeer GroupSchoolsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID35858939
PMCPMC9300596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.