Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858930›Full record

ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2022

Biofilm cultivation facilitates coexistence and adaptive evolution in an industrial bacterial community.

Nathalie N S E Henriksen, Mads Frederik Hansen, Heiko T Kiesewalter, Jakob Russel, Joseph Nesme, Kevin R Foster, Birte Svensson, Gunnar Øregaard, Jakob Herschend, Mette Burmølle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic diversification ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nathalie N S E HenriksenSection of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6588-6346
Mads Frederik HansenSection of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9283-304X
Heiko T KiesewalterSection of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9966-5894
Jakob RusselSection of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Joseph NesmeSection of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kevin R FosterDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-6633
Birte SvenssonEnzyme and Protein Chemistry, Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2993-8196
Gunnar ØregaardDiscovery, Research and Development, Chr. Hansen A/S, 2970, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Jakob HerschendSection of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette BurmølleSection of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. burmolle@bio.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-1870-632X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of ecological, industrial and medical impacts of bacteria result from diverse communities containing multiple species. This diversity presents a significant challenge as co-cultivation of multiple bacterial species frequently leads to species being outcompeted and, with this, the possibility to manipulate, evolve and improve bacterial communities is lost. Ecological theory predicts that a solution to this problem will be to grow species in structured environments, which reduces the likelihood of competitive exclusion. Here, we explored the ability of cultivation in a structured environment to facilitate coexistence, evolution, and adaptation in an industrially important community: Lactococcus lactis and Leuconostoc mesenteroides frequently used as dairy starter cultures. As commonly occurs, passaging of these two species together in a liquid culture model led to the loss of one species in 6 of 20 lineages (30%). By contrast, when we co-cultured the two species as biofilms on beads, a stable coexistence was observed in all lineages studied for over 100 generations. Moreover, we show that the co-culture drove evolution of new high-yield variants, which compared to the ancestor grew more slowly, yielded more cells and had enhanced capability of biofilm formation. Importantly, we also show that these high-yield biofilm strains did not evolve when each species was passaged in monoculture in the biofilm model. Therefore, both co-culture and the biofilm model were conditional for these high-yield strains to evolve. Our study underlines the power of ecological thinking-namely, the importance of structured environments for coexistence-to facilitate cultivation, evolution, and adaptation of industrially important bacterial communities.

Indexed as

BiofilmsLactococcus lactisBacteria

Identifiers

PMID35858930
PMCPMC9300721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.