Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858887›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2022

Effectiveness of interventions to improve medication adherence in adults with depressive disorders: a meta-analysis.

Beatriz González de León, Tasmania Del Pino-Sedeño, Pedro Serrano-Pérez, Cristobalina Rodríguez Álvarez, Daniel Bejarano-Quisoboni, María M Trujillo-Martín

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beatriz González de León *Unidad Docente Multiprofesional de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria "La Laguna ‑ Tenerife Norte", Gerencia de Atención Primaria del Área de Salud de Tenerife, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Tasmania Del Pino-Sedeño *Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. tasmania.delpino@sescs.es.
Pedro Serrano-PérezServicio de Psiquiatría, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristobalina Rodríguez ÁlvarezCampus Ciencias de La Salud. Área de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública. Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Daniel Bejarano-QuisoboniCentro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública (CSISP-FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
María M Trujillo-MartínFundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-adherence to medication is a major obstacle in the treatment of depressive disorders. We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving adherence to medication among adults with depressive disorders with emphasis on initiation and implementation phase.

methodsWe searched Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index for randomized or non-randomized controlled trials up to January 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria of the Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analyses, cumulative and meta-regression analyses for adherence were conducted.

resultsForty-six trials (n = 24,324) were included. Pooled estimate indicates an increase in the probability of adherence to antidepressants at 6 months with the different types of interventions (OR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.62). The improvement in adherence is obtained from 3 months (OR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.10) but it is attenuated at 12 months (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.53). Selected articles show methodological differences, mainly the diversity of both the severity of the depressive disorder and intervention procedures. In the samples of these studies, patients with depression and anxiety seem to benefit most from intervention (OR 2.77, 95% CI: 1.74 to 4.42) and collaborative care is the most effective intervention to improve adherence (OR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.54).

conclusionsOur findings indicate that interventions aimed at improving adherence to medication among adults with depressive disorders are effective up to six months. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of long-term adherence is insufficient and supports the need for further research efforts.

trial registrationInternational Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) number: CRD42017065723 .

Indexed as

Depressive DisorderMedication AdherenceAdultAntidepressive AgentsAnxietyHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicAntidepressive AgentsMajor Depressive DisorderMeta-analysisSystematic reviewTreatment Adherence

Identifiers

PMID35858887
PMCPMC9301839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.