Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858829›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Validation of clinical frailty scale in Chinese translation.

Yi-Chun Chou, Hsiao-Hui Tsou, Ding-Cheng Derrick Chan, Chiung-Jung Wen, Feng-Ping Lu, Kun-Pei Lin, Meng-Chen Wu, Yung-Ming Chen, Jen-Hau Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Validation of the Japanese version of the Clinical Frailty Scale.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Chun ChouDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Chung Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Hui TsouInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, 35 Keyan Road, Zhunan, Miaoli County, 350, Taiwan.
Ding-Cheng Derrick ChanDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Chung Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Chiung-Jung WenDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Chung Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Feng-Ping LuDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Chung Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Kun-Pei LinDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Chung Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Meng-Chen WuDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Chung Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Yung-Ming ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No.1, Jen Ai Road Section 1, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Jen-Hau ChenDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Chung Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan. jhhchen@ntu.edu.tw.
National Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Health Research Institutes · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of frailty is crucial to guide patient care for the elderly. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a reliable, synthesis and clinical judgment-based tool. However, a validated Chinese version of CFS (CFS-C) is lacking. The aim of this study is to describe the translation process of CFS into traditional Chinese and to evaluate its reliability and validity in a geriatric study population in Taiwan.

methodsThis cross-sectional study recruited 221 geriatric outpatients aged 65 years or older at a medical center in Taipei, Taiwan. The Chinese version of CFS was produced following Brislin's translation model. Weighted kappa for agreement and Kendall's tau for correlation were used to assess inter-rater reliability (a subgroup of 52 outpatients) between geriatricians and one research assistant, and validity tests (221 outpatients) by comparing CFS-C with Fried frailty phenotype and Frailty Index based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (FI-CGA). Correlation between CFS-C and other geriatric conditions were also assessed.

resultsThe inter-rater reliability revealed moderate agreement (weighted kappa = 0.60) and strong correlation (Kendall's tau = 0.67). For criterion validity, CFS-C categorisation showed fair agreement (weighted kappa = 0.37) and significant correlation (Kendall's tau = 0.46) with Fried frailty phenotype, and higher agreement (weighted kappa = 0.51) and correlation (Kendall's tau = 0.63) with FI-CGA categorisation. CFS-C was significantly correlated with various geriatric assessments, including functional disability, physical performance, hand grip, comorbidity, cognition, depression, and nutrition status. No significant correlation was found between CFS-C and appendicular muscle mass.

conclusionsThe CFS-C demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability in Chinese older adults in Taiwan. Development of CFS-C enhanced consistency and accuracy of frailty assessment, both in research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHand StrengthHumansReproducibility of ResultsClinical frailty scaleElderlyFrailtyValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID35858829
PMCPMC9298166
OpenAlexW4286008801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.