Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858827›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2022

Consideration of genetic variation and evolutionary history in future conservation of Indian one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis).

Tista Ghosh, Shrewshree Kumar, Kirtika Sharma, Parikshit Kakati, Amit Sharma, Samrat Mondol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tista GhoshAnimal Ecology and Conservation Biology Department, Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248001, India. tista007.tg@gmail.com.
Shrewshree KumarAnimal Ecology and Conservation Biology Department, Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248001, India.
Kirtika SharmaAnimal Ecology and Conservation Biology Department, Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248001, India.
Parikshit KakatiWorld Wide Fund for Nature-India, 172B Lodhi Estate, New Delhi, 110003, India.
Amit SharmaWorld Wide Fund for Nature-India, 172B Lodhi Estate, New Delhi, 110003, India.
Samrat MondolAnimal Ecology and Conservation Biology Department, Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248001, India. samrat@wii.gov.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe extant members of the Asian rhinos have experienced severe population and range declines since Pleistocene through a combination of natural and anthropogenic factors. The one-horned rhino is the only Asian species recovered from such conditions but most of the extant populations are reaching carrying capacity. India currently harbours ~ 83% of the global wild one-horned rhino populations distributed across seven protected areas. Recent assessments recommend reintroduction-based conservation approaches for the species, and implementation of such efforts would greatly benefit from detailed genetic assessments and evolutionary history of these populations. Using mitochondrial data, we investigated the phylogeography, divergence and demographic history of one-horned rhinos across its Indian range.

resultsWe report the first complete mitogenome from all the extant Indian wild one-horned rhino populations (n = 16 individuals). Further, we identified all polymorphic sites and assessed rhino phylogeography (2531 bp mtDNA, n = 111 individuals) across India. Results showed 30 haplotypes distributed as three distinct genetic clades (F

conclusionThe phylogeography and phylogenomic outcomes suggest recognition of three 'Evolutionary Significant Units (ESUs)' in Indian rhino. With ongoing genetic isolation of the current populations, future management efforts should focus on identifying genetically variable founder animals and consider periodic supplementation events while planning future rhino reintroduction programs in India. Such well-informed, multidisciplinary approach will be the only way to ensure evolutionary, ecological and demographic stability of the species across its range.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesPerissodactylaAnimalsFemaleGenetic VariationParks, RecreationalPhylogeographyEvolutionary significant units (ESUs)Founder effectMegaherbivorePaleobiogeography eventsReintroduction programRhinocerotidae family

Identifiers

PMID35858827
PMCPMC9301832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.