Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858716›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2022

Evaluation of a novel multiplex qPCR method for rapid detection and quantification of pathogens associated with calf diarrhoea.

Potjamas Pansri, Birgitta Svensmark, Gang Liu, Stig Milan Thamsborg, Egle Kudirkiene, Henrik Vedel Nielsen, Nicole Bakkegård Goecke, John Elmerdahl Olsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diversity ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Establishment and epidemiological investigation of a dual fluorescent qPCR assay forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Potjamas PansriDNA Diagnostic A/S, Risskov, Denmark.
Birgitta SvensmarkLVK Veterinary Cattle Practice, Hobro, Denmark.
Gang LiuDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stig Milan ThamsborgDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Egle KudirkieneDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Vedel NielsenDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nicole Bakkegård GoeckeDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John Elmerdahl OlsenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6225-6587

Funding

Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark 34009-16-078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDiarrhoea is a common health problem in calves and a main reason for use of antimicrobials. It is associated with several bacterial, viral and parasitic pathogens, most of which are commonly present in healthy animals. Methods, which quantify the causative agents, may therefore improve confidence in associating a pathogen to the disease. This study evaluated a novel commercially available, multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay (Enterit4Calves) for detection and quantification of pathogens associated with calf-diarrhoea. METHODS AND

resultsPerformance of the method was first evaluated under laboratory conditions. Then it was compared with current routine methods for detection of pathogens in faecal samples from 65 calves with diarrhoea and in 30 spiked faecal samples. The qPCR efficiencies were between 84%-103% and detection limits of 100-1000 copies of nucleic acids per sample were observed. Correct identification was obtained on 42 strains of cultured target bacteria, with only one false positive reaction from 135 nontarget bacteria. Kappa values for agreement between the novel assay and current routine methods varied between 0.38 and 0.83.

conclusionThe novel qPCR method showed good performance under laboratory conditions and a fair to good agreement with current routine methods when used for testing of field samples. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: In addition to having fair to good detection abilities, the novel qPCR method allowed quantification of pathogens. In the future, use of quantification may improve diagnosis and hence treatment of calf diarrhoea.

Indexed as

Multiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionNucleic AcidsAnimalsBacteriaCattleDiarrheaFecesSensitivity and SpecificityNucleic AcidsCalf diarrhoeacalf scoursdetectionmultiplex qPCRquantification

Identifiers

PMID35858716
PMCPMC9796748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.