Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858689›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers during second wave in England and impact of vaccines: prospective multicentre cohort study (SIREN) and mathematical model.

Diane Pople, Edward J M Monk, Stephanie Evans, Sarah Foulkes, Jasmin Islam, Edgar Wellington, Ana Atti, Russell Hope, Julie Robotham, Susan Hopkins and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Pregnancy Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Public Health Lens.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diane PopleUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Edward J M MonkUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9546-9650
Stephanie EvansUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Sarah FoulkesUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Jasmin IslamUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Edgar WellingtonUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Ana AttiUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Russell HopeUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Julie RobothamUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Susan HopkinsUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Colin S BrownUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Victoria J HallUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
SIREN Study Group
UK Health Security Agency · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_20031Medical Research Council MC_PC_20060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the incidence of, risk factors for, and impact of vaccines on primary SARS-CoV-2 infection during the second wave of the covid-19 pandemic in susceptible hospital healthcare workers in England.

designMulticentre prospective cohort study.

settingNational Health Service secondary care health organisations (trusts) in England between 1 September 2020 and 30 April 2021.

participantsClinical, support, and administrative staff enrolled in the SARS-CoV-2 Immunity and Reinfection Evaluation (SIREN) study with no evidence of previous infection. Vaccination status was obtained from national covid-19 vaccination registries and self-reported.

main outcome measureSARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. Mixed effects logistic regression was conducted to determine demographic and occupational risk factors for infection, and an individual based mathematical model was used to predict how large the burden could have been if vaccines had not been available from 8 December 2020 .

resultsDuring England's second wave, 12.9% (2353/18 284) of susceptible SIREN participants became infected with SARS-CoV-2. Infections peaked in late December 2020 and decreased from January 2021, concurrent with the cohort's rapid vaccination coverage and a national lockdown. In multivariable analysis, factors increasing the likelihood of infection in the second wave were being under 25 years old (20.3% (132/651); adjusted odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.69), living in a large household (15.8% (282/1781); 1.54, 1.23 to 1.94, for participants from households of five or more people), having frequent exposure to patients with covid-19 (19.2% (723/3762); 1.79, 1.56 to 2.06, for participants with exposure every shift), working in an emergency department or inpatient ward setting (20.8% (386/1855); 1.76, 1.45 to 2.14), and being a healthcare assistant (18.1% (267/1479); 1.43, 1.16 to 1.77). Time to first vaccination emerged as being strongly associated with infection (P<0.001), with each additional day multiplying a participant's adjusted odds ratio by 1.02. Mathematical model simulations indicated that an additional 9.9% of all patient facing hospital healthcare workers would have been infected were it not for the rapid vaccination coverage.

conclusionsThe rapid covid-19 vaccine rollout from December 2020 averted infection in a large proportion of hospital healthcare workers in England: without vaccines, second wave infections could have been 69% higher. With booster vaccinations being needed for adequate protection from the omicron variant, and perhaps the need for further boosters for future variants, ensuring equitable delivery to healthcare workers is essential. The findings also highlight occupational risk factors that persisted in healthcare workers despite vaccine rollout; a greater understanding of the transmission dynamics responsible for these is needed to help to optimise the infection prevention and control policies that protect healthcare workers from infection and therefore to support staffing levels and maintain healthcare provision.

trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN11041050.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdultCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelHumansModels, TheoreticalPandemicsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2State MedicineCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35858689
PMCPMC9295077
OpenAlexW4286009772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.