ArticleAmerican journal of perinatology2024
Patient Perception of Care, Outcomes, and Consequences from Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Survey-Based Study.
Article in American journal of perinatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Diagnosis and Management: Green-Top Guideline No. 27a.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- Uterus-Preserving Surgery for Placenta Previa and Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Retrospective Analysis of the Evolution of a Standardized Step-Up Approach in a 13-Year Single-Surgeon Cohort of 324 Cases.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Survivors of Placenta Accreta: What Their Blogs Can Tell Us.The Journal of perinatal education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePlacenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is an obstetric diagnosis that carries significant risks. However, little is known about patient perceptions of care. This study was conducted to describe the patient experience, reported outcomes, and assess geographical variation in PAS care in the United States. STUDY
designPartnering with a PAS patient advocacy organization, we conducted an online survey of PAS patients. Perceptions of care and outcomes, and geographic variation were described.
resultsWe received 108 responses (69% response rate); 103 respondents delivered in the United States. Demographic characteristics were similar across each region. Most (67%) reported at least one prior cesarean delivery and 53% reported placenta previa in the PAS pregnancy. Over half (63%) reported an antenatal suspicion of PAS and 66% of those respondents reported changing their delivery hospital as a result of their antenatal diagnosis. Though not statistically significant, both showed variability across regions (both
conclusionAs reported by prior PAS patients, perception of care and outcomes are overall favorable. There are long-term physical and mental adverse consequences reported. Geographical variation is mixed, however, national guidelines are predominately followed. KEY POINTS: · Patient perceptions of care and outcomes are overall positive and favorable.. · Long lasting physical and mental health consequence from PAS pregnancies are commonly seen.. · Multidisciplinary care is widely adopted for PAS pregnancies..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.