Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858436›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Seed DNA damage responses promote germination and growth in

Wanda M Waterworth, Rosalind Latham, Dapeng Wang, Mona Alsharif, Christopher E West

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetic dissection of Brassica napus seed vigor after aging.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  17. Autophagy maintains endosperm quality during seed storage to preserve germination ability in Arabidopsis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Seed longevity and genome damage.Bioscience reports · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wanda M WaterworthFaculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Rosalind LathamFaculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Dapeng WangLeeds Omics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9925-4574
Mona AlsharifFaculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Christopher E WestFaculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1853-0969

Funding

UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M011151/1UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/S002081/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT104918MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The desiccated, quiescent state of seeds confers extended survival of the embryonic plant. However, accumulation of striking levels of genome damage in quiescence impairs germination and threatens plant survival. The mechanisms by which seeds mitigate this damage remain unclear. Here, we reveal that imbibed

Indexed as

ArabidopsisDNA DamageGerminationSeedsArabidopsis ProteinsSeedlingsTranscription FactorsArabidopsis ProteinsSOG1 protein, ArabidopsisTranscription FactorsDNA repairgenome stabilitygerminationseedseed quality

Identifiers

PMID35858436
PMCPMC9335332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.