Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858349›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

DNA damage reduces heterogeneity and coherence of chromatin motions.

Maëlle Locatelli, Josh Lawrimore, Hua Lin, Sarvath Sanaullah, Clayton Seitz, Dave Segall, Paul Kefer, Naike Salvador Moreno, Benton Lietz, Rebecca Anderson and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Multi-Scale Imaging of the Dynamic Organization of Chromatin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Maëlle LocatelliDepartment of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157.ORCID 0000-0002-0825-7180
Josh LawrimoreDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Hua LinDepartment of Physics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Sarvath SanaullahDepartment of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157.ORCID 0000-0002-9041-2652
Clayton SeitzDepartment of Physics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Dave SegallDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109.
Paul KeferDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109.
Naike Salvador MorenoDepartment of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157.ORCID 0000-0003-3875-4433
Benton LietzDepartment of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157.
Rebecca AndersonDepartment of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157.
Julia HolmesDepartment of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157.
Chongli YuanDavidson School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
George HolzwarthDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109.ORCID 0000-0002-7580-3356
Kerry S BloomDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.ORCID 0000-0002-3457-004X
Jing LiuDepartment of Physics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Keith BoninDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109.
Pierre-Alexandre VidiDepartment of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157.
Wake Forest University · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USUniversity of Indianapolis · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USIndiana University Health · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Unfolded Protein Response and Autophagy in T Helper Cell Effector FunctionP20GM121176 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Monica Rosas Lemus · 2017 to 2026
$24.9M
Chromatin mobility in response to DNA damageU01CA214282 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BONIN, KEITH D, PARDEE, TIMOTHY SEBASTIAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214282NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin motions depend on and may regulate genome functions, in particular the DNA damage response. In yeast, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) globally increase chromatin diffusion, whereas in higher eukaryotes the impact of DSBs on chromatin dynamics is more nuanced. We mapped the motions of chromatin microdomains in mammalian cells using diffractive optics and photoactivatable chromatin probes and found a high level of spatial heterogeneity. DNA damage reduces heterogeneity and imposes spatially defined shifts in motions: Distal to DNA breaks, chromatin motions are globally reduced, whereas chromatin retains higher mobility at break sites. These effects are driven by context-dependent changes in chromatin compaction. Photoactivated lattices of chromatin microdomains are ideal to quantify microscale coupling of chromatin motion. We measured correlation distances up to 2 µm in the cell nucleus, spanning chromosome territories, and speculate that this correlation distance between chromatin microdomains corresponds to the physical separation of A and B compartments identified in chromosome conformation capture experiments. After DNA damage, chromatin motions become less correlated, a phenomenon driven by phase separation at DSBs. Our data indicate tight spatial control of chromatin motions after genomic insults, which may facilitate repair at the break sites and prevent deleterious contacts of DSBs, thereby reducing the risk of genomic rearrangements.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairAnimalsChromosomesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeChromatinchromatin mobilityDNA damageheterogeneityphase separationstructured illumination

Identifiers

PMID35858349
PMCPMC9304018
OpenAlexW4285093862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.