Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858333›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Mass spectrometry imaging to explore molecular heterogeneity in cell culture.

Tanja Bien, Krischan Koerfer, Jan Schwenzfeier, Klaus Dreisewerd, Jens Soltwisch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New Analytical Technologies to Resolve, Interpret, and Understand Lipid Complexity.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanja BienInstitute of Hygiene, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6080-548X
Krischan KoerferInstitute for Psychology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-4178
Jan SchwenzfeierInstitute of Hygiene, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0795-2405
Klaus DreisewerdInstitute of Hygiene, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7619-808X
Jens SoltwischInstitute of Hygiene, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0258-1561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular analysis on the single-cell level represents a rapidly growing field in the life sciences. While bulk analysis from a pool of cells provides a general molecular profile, it is blind to heterogeneities between individual cells. This heterogeneity, however, is an inherent property of every cell population. Its analysis is fundamental to understanding the development, function, and role of specific cells of the same genotype that display different phenotypical properties. Single-cell mass spectrometry (MS) aims to provide broad molecular information for a significantly large number of cells to help decipher cellular heterogeneity using statistical analysis. Here, we present a sensitive approach to single-cell MS based on high-resolution MALDI-2-MS imaging in combination with MALDI-compatible staining and use of optical microscopy. Our approach allowed analyzing large amounts of unperturbed cells directly from the growth chamber. Confident coregistration of both modalities enabled a reliable compilation of single-cell mass spectra and a straightforward inclusion of optical as well as mass spectrometric features in the interpretation of data. The resulting multimodal datasets permit the use of various statistical methods like machine learning-driven classification and multivariate analysis based on molecular profile and establish a direct connection of MS data with microscopy information of individual cells. Displaying data in the form of histograms for individual signal intensities helps to investigate heterogeneous expression of specific lipids within the cell culture and to identify subpopulations intuitively. Ultimately, t-MALDI-2-MSI measurements at 2-µm pixel sizes deliver a glimpse of intracellular lipid distributions and reveal molecular profiles for subcellular domains.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingSingle-Cell AnalysisSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationCell Culture TechniquesLipid MetabolismMultivariate Analysiscellular heterogeneitylipidomicssingle-cell mass spectrometryt-MALDI-2-MSI

Identifiers

PMID35858333
PMCPMC9303856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.