Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858296›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

The influence of social norms varies with "others" groups: Evidence from COVID-19 vaccination intentions.

Nathaniel Rabb, Jake Bowers, David Glick, Kevin H Wilson, David Yokum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mortality risk information and health-seeking behavior during an epidemic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathaniel RabbThe Policy Lab, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903.ORCID 0000-0002-7283-2549
Jake BowersDepartment of Political Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801.ORCID 0000-0002-4048-1166
David GlickDepartment of Political Science, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215.
Kevin H WilsonThe Policy Lab, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903.ORCID 0000-0001-8920-7152
David YokumThe Policy Lab, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The theory that health behaviors spread through social groups implies that efforts to control COVID-19 through vaccination will succeed if people believe that others in their groups are getting vaccinated. But "others" can refer to many groups, including one's family, neighbors, fellow city or state dwellers, or copartisans. One challenge to examining these understudied distinctions is that many factors may confound observed relationships between perceived social norms (what people believe others do) and intended behaviors (what people themselves will do), as there are plausible common causes for both. We address these issues using survey data collected in the United States during late fall 2020 (

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesIntentionSocial NormsVaccinationHumansUnited StatesCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19social normsvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35858296
PMCPMC9303870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.