Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858264›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2022

Perception of Physical Demand, Mental Demand, and Performance: A Comparison of Two Voice Interventions for Parkinson's Disease.

Kelly Richardson, Jessica E Huber, Brianna Kiefer, Sandy Snyder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Respiratory Responses to Two Voice Interventions for Parkinson's Disease.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelly RichardsonDepartment of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst.ORCID 0000-0001-5976-1232
Jessica E HuberDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.ORCID 0000-0003-1046-2754
Brianna KieferDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Sandy SnyderDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Google (United States) · US

Funding

A comparison of two forms of intensive voice treatment for Parkinson's diseaseR21DC016718 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI RICHARDSON, KELLY · 2018 to 2020
$459k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to examine the effect of two voice intervention approaches for hypophonia secondary to Parkinson's disease (PD) on self-reported measures of physical demand, mental demand, and vocal performance.

methodThirty-four persons with hypophonia secondary to PD were assigned to one of three groups: Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) LOUD (

resultsThe LSVT LOUD and the SpeechVive participants demonstrated a significant posttreatment increase in SPL (dB), in comparison to the clinical controls, thus confirming a positive intervention effect. The LSVT LOUD participants reported significantly higher ratings of physical and mental demand over the course of treatment, in comparison to the SpeechVive participants.

conclusionConsideration of the mental and physical demand associated with two voice intervention approaches, commonly used for PD, may help to foster improved therapeutic compliance and treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseVoiceVoice DisordersHumansPerceptionVoice Training

Identifiers

PMID35858264
PMCPMC9907449
OpenAlexW4286212690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.