ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022
Interactions between the
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- On the nature of grief: uncovering the evolutionary roots of loss across the animal realm.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- Three-dimensional U-Net with transfer learning improves automated whole brain delineation from MRI brain scans of rats, mice, and monkeys.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- An epigenetic candidate-gene association study of parental styles in suicide attempters with substance use disorders.Addiction biology · 2024Article
- Neurobiological traces of grief: Examining the impact of offspring loss after birth on rat mothers' brain and stress-coping behavior in the first week postpartum.Neuroscience applied · 2024Article
- Oxytocin: A developmental journey.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2023Review
- Titi monkey father-daughter bond-related behaviors explain stress response variability.Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2023Article
- Attachment across the lifespan: Examining the intersection of pair bonding neurobiology and healthy aging.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023Review
- Romantic love evolved by co-opting mother-infant bonding.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Individual differences in social homeostasis.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Review
- Oxytocin does not stand alone.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Mapping Kappa Opioid Receptor Binding in Titi Monkeys with [Molecular imagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Selective adult social attachments, or 'pair bonds', represent central relationships for individuals in a number of social species, including humans. Loss of a pair mate has emotional consequences that may or may not diminish over time, and that often translate into impaired psychological and physical health. In this paper, we review the literature on the neuroendocrine mechanisms for the emotional consequences of partner loss, with a special focus on hypothesized interactions between oxytocin, corticotropin-releasing hormone and the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.