Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858070›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Underwater visibility constrains the foraging behaviour of a diving pelagic seabird.

J Darby, M Clairbaux, A Bennison, J L Quinn, M J Jessopp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The influence of rivers on seabird foraging ecology.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enhanced conspicuousness of prey in warmer water mitigates the constraint of turbidity for predators.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J DarbySchool of Biological, Environmental and Earth Sciences, University College Cork, Cork T23 N73K, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9757-7150
M ClairbauxSchool of Biological, Environmental and Earth Sciences, University College Cork, Cork T23 N73K, Ireland.
A BennisonBritish Antarctic Survey, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK.
J L QuinnSchool of Biological, Environmental and Earth Sciences, University College Cork, Cork T23 N73K, Ireland.
M J JessoppSchool of Biological, Environmental and Earth Sciences, University College Cork, Cork T23 N73K, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2692-3730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the sensory ecology of species is vital if we are to predict how they will function in a changing environment. Visual cues are fundamentally important for many predators when detecting and capturing prey. However, many marine areas have become more turbid through processes influenced by climate change, potentially affecting the ability of marine predators to detect prey. We performed the first study that directly relates a pelagic seabird species's foraging behaviour to oceanic turbidity. We collected biologging data from 79 foraging trips and 5472 dives of a visually dependent, pursuit-diving seabird, the Manx shearwater (

Indexed as

DivingAnimalsBirdsEcologyFeeding BehaviorPredatory Behaviorclimate changeManx shearwatersprey detectionseabird foragingsensory ecologyturbidity

Identifiers

PMID35858070
PMCPMC9277241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.