Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35858053›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Not just females: the socio-ecology of social interactions between spider monkey males.

Amor Aline Saldaña-Sánchez, Colleen M Schaffner, Sandra Smith-Aguilar, Filippo Aureli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amor Aline Saldaña-SánchezInstituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4971-9134
Colleen M SchaffnerInstituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico.
Sandra Smith-AguilarInstituto de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Filippo AureliInstituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0671-013X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male-male relationships are mostly characterized by competition. However, males also cooperate with one another if socio-ecological conditions are suitable. Due to their male philopatry, the need for cooperation in home range defence and high degree of fission-fusion dynamics, spider monkeys provide an opportunity to investigate how male-male interactions are associated with socio-ecological factors, such as the presence of potentially receptive females, the degree of food availability and the likelihood of home range defence. We tested predictions about changes in social interactions between wild spider monkey males in relation to these factors. First, males did not change their interaction patterns when potentially receptive females were in the subgroup compared to when they were absent. Second, males tended to be less tolerant of one another when feeding, but spent more time grooming, in contact and proximity with one another when food availability was lower than when it was higher. Third, males exchanged fewer embraces, spent less time grooming, in proximity and in contact with one another, and spent more time vigilant at the home range boundary area than at other locations. Our findings contribute to the understanding of social flexibility and the importance of considering males in socio-ecological models of any group-living species.

Indexed as

AtelinaeAnimalsFemaleGroomingHoming BehaviorMaleSocial BehaviorSocial Interactionbehavioural flexibilitycompetitioncooperationfood availabilityhome rangemale–male relationships

Identifiers

PMID35858053
PMCPMC9257287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.