Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35857943›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2022

Long-Term Ventricular Pacing Dependency and Pacemaker Implantation Predictors after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - A 1-Year Follow-Up.

Ricardo Alves Pinto, Tânia Proença, Miguel Martins Carvalho, Gonçalo Pestana, Ana Lebreiro, Luis Adão, Filipe Macedo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo Alves PintoDepartamento de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto - Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1002-9985
Tânia ProençaDepartamento de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto - Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0881-9411
Miguel Martins CarvalhoDepartamento de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto - Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-009X
Gonçalo PestanaDepartamento de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto - Portugal.
Ana LebreiroDepartamento de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto - Portugal.
Luis AdãoDepartamento de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto - Portugal.
Filipe MacedoDepartamento de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto - Portugal.
Hospital de São João · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConduction disturbances (CD) are the most frequent complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and there continues to be a lack of consensus on their management.

objectiveTo assess new CD and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after TAVR and to evaluate the ventricular pacing percentage (VP) up to 1 year of follow-up.

methodsPatients who underwent TAVR from October 2014 to November 2019 were enrolled; patients with previous PPM were excluded. Clinical, procedure, ECG, and PPM data were collected up to 1 year after implantation. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 0.05.

resultsA total of 340 patients underwent TAVR. The most frequent CD was the new left bundle branch block (LBBB; 32.2%), which 56% resolved after 6 months. Right bundle branch block (RBBB) was the biggest risk factor for advanced atrioventricular block (AVB) [OR=8.46; p<0.001] and PPM implantation [OR=5.18, p<0.001], followed by previous low-grade AVB [OR=2.25; p=0.016 for PPM implantation]. Regarding procedure characteristics, newer generation valves and valve-in-valve procedures were associated with fewer CDs. Overall, 18.5% of patients had a PPM implanted post-TAVR. At first PPM evaluation, patients with advanced AVB had a median percentage of VP of 80% and 83% at one year. Regarding patients with LBBB plus low-grade AVB, median VP was lower (6% at first assessment, p=0.036; 2% at one year, p = 0.065).

conclusionLBBB was the most frequent CD after TAVR, with more than half being resolved in the first six months. RBBB was the major risk factor for advanced AVB and PPM implantation. Advanced AVB was associated with a higher percentage of VP at 1 year of follow-up.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisAtrioventricular BlockPacemaker, ArtificialTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic ValveArrhythmias, CardiacBundle-Branch BlockFollow-Up StudiesHumansRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35857943
PMCPMC9563875
OpenAlexW4285496018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.