Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35857869›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Ancient variation of the

Marion C Müller, Lukas Kunz, Seraina Schudel, Aaron W Lawson, Sandrine Kammerecker, Jonatan Isaksson, Michele Wyler, Johannes Graf, Alexandros G Sotiropoulos, Coraline R Praz and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Development and application of aFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Powdery mildew effectors AVRMolecular plant pathology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marion C MüllerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5594-2319
Lukas KunzDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8155-5408
Seraina SchudelDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3999-843X
Aaron W LawsonDepartment of Plant Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8164-2555
Sandrine KammereckerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonatan IsakssonDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3934-4241
Michele WylerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1097-5322
Johannes GrafDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5419-9842
Alexandros G SotiropoulosDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3591-0851
Coraline R PrazDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9133-4406
Beatrice ManserDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7592-5089
Thomas WickerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Salim BourrasDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0855-5433
Beat KellerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2379-9225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introgressions of chromosomal segments from related species into wheat are important sources of resistance against fungal diseases. The durability and effectiveness of introgressed resistance genes upon agricultural deployment is highly variable-a phenomenon that remains poorly understood, as the corresponding fungal avirulence genes are largely unknown. Until its breakdown, the

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceGenetic IntrogressionPlant DiseasesSecaleTriticumChromosome MappingPlant BreedingQuantitative Trait Lociavirulence genegene conversionpowdery mildewresistance introgressionwheat

Identifiers

PMID35857869
PMCPMC9335242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.