Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35857804›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Fully automated image quality evaluation on patient CT: Multi-vendor and multi-reconstruction study.

Minsoo Chun, Jin Hwa Choi, Sihwan Kim, Chulkyun Ahn, Jong Hyo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. State-of-the-Art Deep Learning CT Reconstruction Algorithms in Abdominal Imaging.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2024
    Review
  8. Left, Then Right Internal Carotid Artery Dissection: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Minsoo ChunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University Gwang Myeong Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8578-9976
Jin Hwa ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sihwan KimDepartment of Applied Bioengineering, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9444-0303
Chulkyun AhnDepartment of Transdisciplinary Studies, Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2919-4892
Jong Hyo KimInstitute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5695-4976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the recent advancements of computed tomography (CT) technology have contributed in reducing radiation dose and image noise, an objective evaluation of image quality in patient scans has not yet been established. In this study, we present a patient-specific CT image quality evaluation method that includes fully automated measurements of noise level, structure sharpness, and alteration of structure. This study used the CT images of 120 patients from four different CT scanners reconstructed with three types of algorithm: filtered back projection (FBP), vendor-specific iterative reconstruction (IR), and a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM, ClariCT.AI, ClariPi Inc.). The structure coherence feature (SCF) was used to divide an image into the homogeneous (RH) and structure edge (RS) regions, which in turn were used to localize the regions of interests (ROIs) for subsequent analysis of image quality indices. The noise level was calculated by averaging the standard deviations from five randomly selected ROIs on RH, and the mean SCFs on RS was used to estimate the structure sharpness. The structure alteration was defined by the standard deviation ratio between RS and RH on the subtraction image between FBP and IR or DLM, in which lower structure alterations indicate successful noise reduction without degradation of structure details. The estimated structure sharpness showed a high correlation of 0.793 with manually measured edge slopes. Compared to FBP, IR and DLM showed 34.38% and 51.30% noise reduction, 2.87% and 0.59% lower structure sharpness, and 2.20% and -12.03% structure alteration, respectively, on an average. DLM showed statistically superior performance to IR in all three image quality metrics. This study is expected to contribute to enhance the CT protocol optimization process by allowing a high throughput and quantitative image quality evaluation during the introduction or adjustment of lower-dose CT protocol into routine practice.

Indexed as

Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansRadiation Dosage

Identifiers

PMID35857804
PMCPMC9299323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.