Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35857787›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2022

Multi-color dSTORM microscopy in Hormad1-/- spermatocytes reveals alterations in meiotic recombination intermediates and synaptonemal complex structure.

Lieke Koornneef, Johan A Slotman, Esther Sleddens-Linkels, Wiggert A van Cappellen, Marco Barchi, Attila Tóth, Joost Gribnau, Adriaan B Houtsmuller, Willy M Baarends

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Computational Tools for the Analysis of Meiotic Prophase I Images.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lieke KoornneefDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9742-9580
Johan A SlotmanDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Optical Imaging Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9705-9620
Esther Sleddens-LinkelsDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wiggert A van CappellenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Optical Imaging Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9059-8365
Marco BarchiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1104-6234
Attila TóthInstitute of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine at the TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5744-3847
Joost GribnauDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Adriaan B HoutsmullerDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Optical Imaging Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Willy M BaarendsDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9179-850X
Erasmus MC · NLTechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinases RAD51 and its meiosis-specific paralog DMC1 accumulate on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) of programmed DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in meiosis. Here we used three-color dSTORM microscopy, and a mouse model with severe defects in meiotic DSB formation and synapsis (Hormad1-/-) to obtain more insight in the recombinase accumulation patterns in relation to repair progression. First, we used the known reduction in meiotic DSB frequency in Hormad1-/- spermatocytes to be able to conclude that the RAD51/DMC1 nanofoci that preferentially localize at distances of ~300 nm form within a single DSB site, whereas a second preferred distance of ~900 nm, observed only in wild type, represents inter-DSB distance. Next, we asked whether the proposed role of HORMAD1 in repair inhibition affects the RAD51/DMC1 accumulation patterns. We observed that the two most frequent recombinase configurations (1 DMC1 and 1 RAD51 nanofocus (D1R1), and D2R1) display coupled frequency dynamics over time in wild type, but were constant in the Hormad1-/- model, indicating that the lifetime of these intermediates was altered. Recombinase nanofoci were also smaller in Hormad1-/- spermatocytes, consistent with changes in ssDNA length or protein accumulation. Furthermore, we established that upon synapsis, recombinase nanofoci localized closer to the synaptonemal complex (SYCP3), in both wild type and Hormad1-/- spermatocytes. Finally, the data also revealed a hitherto unknown function of HORMAD1 in inhibiting coil formation in the synaptonemal complex. SPO11 plays a similar but weaker role in coiling and SYCP1 had the opposite effect. Using this large super-resolution dataset, we propose models with the D1R1 configuration representing one DSB end containing recombinases, and the other end bound by other ssDNA binding proteins, or both ends loaded by the two recombinases, but in below-resolution proximity. This may then often evolve into D2R1, then D1R2, and finally back to D1R1, when DNA synthesis has commenced.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsSpermatocytesSynaptonemal ComplexAnimalsDNAMaleMeiosisMiceMice, KnockoutMicroscopyRad51 RecombinaseRecombinasesCell Cycle ProteinsDNANohma protein, mouseRad51 RecombinaseRecombinases

Identifiers

PMID35857787
PMCPMC9342782
OpenAlexW4286007931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.