Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35857721›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Necessary conditions for sustainable water and sanitation service delivery in schools: A systematic review.

Christine JiaRui Pu, Poojan Patel, Gracie Hornsby, Gary L Darmstadt, Jennifer Davis

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Determinants of access to waste management services in healthcare facilities in 14 low- and middle-income countries.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine JiaRui PuDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University School of Engineering, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6168-5670
Poojan PatelDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University School of Engineering, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9587-4015
Gracie HornsbyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University School of Engineering, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Gary L DarmstadtDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7522-5824
Jennifer DavisDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University School of Engineering, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Stanford University · USPalo Alto Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) services confers significant health and economic benefits, especially for children, but only if those services can be delivered on a consistent basis. The challenge of sustainable, school-based WASH service delivery has been widely documented, particularly in resource-constrained contexts. We conducted a systematic review of published research that identifies drivers of, or tests solutions to, this challenge within low- and middle-income countries (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020199163). Authors in the first group employ cross-sectional research designs and interrogate previously implemented school WASH interventions. Most conclude that dysfunctional accountability and information sharing mechanisms drive school WASH service delivery failures. By contrast, most of the interventions developed and tested experimentally by authors in the second group focus on increasing the financial and material resources available to schools for WASH service delivery. Overall, these authors find negligible impact of such infusions of cash, infrastructure, and supplies across a variety of sustainability outcome metrics. Taken together, the evidence suggests that sustainable service delivery depends on three simultaneously necessary components: resources, information, and accountability. Drawing upon theory and evidence from social psychology, public management, and political science, we identify priority knowledge gaps that can meaningfully improve the design of effective interventions. We also highlight the importance of both interdisciplinary collaboration and local expertise in designing WASH programming that aligns with sociocultural and institutional norms, and is thus more likely to generate sustainable impact.

Indexed as

SanitationWater SupplyChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansHygieneWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID35857721
PMCPMC9299385
OpenAlexW4286007783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.