Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35857354›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2022

A Mixed Reality Cognitive Orthosis to Support Older Adults in Achieving Their Daily Living Activities: Focus Group Study With Clinical Experts.

Amel Yaddaden, Guillaume Spalla, Charles Gouin-Vallerand, Patricia Briskie-Semeniuk, Nathalie Bier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Smart Glasses for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amel YaddadenÉcole de réadaptation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-8237
Guillaume SpallaCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2280-7572
Charles Gouin-VallerandCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-2932
Patricia Briskie-SemeniukÉcole de réadaptation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6097-3603
Nathalie BierÉcole de réadaptation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2940-694X
Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMixed reality is an emerging technology that allows us to blend virtual objects into the actual user's environment. This can be realized using head-mounted displays. Many recent studies have suggested the possibility of using this technology to support cognition in people with neurodegenerative disorders (NDs). However, most studies have explored improvements in cognition rather than in independence and safety during the accomplishment of daily living activities. Therefore, it is crucial to document the possibility of using mixed reality to support the independence of older adults in their daily lives.

objectiveThis study is part of a larger user-centered study of a cognitive orthosis using pure mixed reality to support the independence of people living with NDs. This study aimed to explore (the difficulties encountered by older adults with NDs in their daily life to ensure that pure mixed reality meets their needs, (the most effective interventions with this population to determine what types of assistance should be provided by pure mixed reality technology, how the pure mixed reality technology should provide assistance to promote aging in place, and the main facilitators of and barriers to the use of this technology.

methodsWe conducted a descriptive, qualitative study. A total of 5 focus groups were completed with occupational therapists who had expertise in the disease and its functional impacts (N=29) to gather information. Each focus group met once for a 1-hour period. All sessions were held over a 3-month period. A semistructured interview guide was used. All group interviews were audiotaped with the consent of each participant to facilitate the data analysis. We conducted inductive qualitative analysis in four stages using a thematic analysis approach: full transcription of the audio recordings, first-order coding of the transcribed data, second-order coding from the first-order code list, and data reduction and matrix development.

resultsThe results suggested that the main difficulties encountered by this population were in remembering to complete tasks, initiating the tasks, and planning the tasks. Several interventions are used to improve the independence of this population, such as prevention, simplification or facilitation, adaptation, and compensation. The use of pure mixed reality in older adults with NDs to promote independence and safety at home is promising and may respond to several clinical functions identified by the participants. Finally, pure mixed reality has good potential for use in this population and involves certain facilitators and obstacles, such as resources, technical aspects, and social considerations.

conclusionsThe cognitive orthosis that will be developed in light of this study will act as a proof of concept for the possibility of supporting people with NDs using pure mixed reality.

Indexed as

cognitive orthosisdaily activitiesfocus groupmixed realitymobile phoneolder adultsqualitative studysmartphone

Identifiers

PMID35857354
PMCPMC9350820
OpenAlexW4285331942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.