Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35857328›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Ocular Surface Immune Cell Profiles in Contact Lens-Induced Discomfort.

Archana Padmanabhan Nair, Swaminathan Sethu, Harsha Nagaraj, Vijay Kumar, Sriharsha Nagaraj, Zohra Fadli, Charles Scales, Mike Chemaly, Xiao-Yu Song, Arkasubhra Ghosh and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lubricating drops for contact lens discomfort in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Ocular surface immune cell diversity in dry eye disease.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Archana Padmanabhan NairGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
Swaminathan SethuGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
Harsha NagarajDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.
Vijay KumarDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.
Sriharsha NagarajDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.
Zohra FadliJohnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Charles ScalesJohnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Mike ChemalyJohnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Xiao-Yu SongJohnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Arkasubhra GhoshGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
Bailin LiangJohnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Narayana Nethralaya · INJohnson & Johnson (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Contact lens-induced discomfort (CLD) remains a primary factor in discontinuation or prevention of contact lens wear. Thus, we investigated the role of ocular surface immune cells in subjects with CLD. Methods: Habitual contact lens (CL) wearers with CLD (n = 19; 38 eyes) and without CLD (n = 21; 42 eyes) as determined by the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 was included in a trial. Enrolled subjects used either of the two types of CL (designated as CL-A or CL-D). Ocular surface cells from the bulbar conjunctiva were obtained by impression cytology. The collected cells were phenotyped using fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies specific for leukocytes (CD45+), neutrophils (CD66b+,High,Low), macrophages (CD163+), T cells (CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+), natural killer (NK) cells (CD56+, High, Low), natural killer T (NKT) cells (CD3+CD56+), and gamma delta T (γδT) cells (CD3+γδTCR+) by flow cytometry. Further, corneal dendritic cell density (cDCD) was also determined using in vivo confocal microscopy. Results: Significantly higher proportions of CD45+ cells were observed in subjects with CLD compared to those without CLD. The percentages of CD66bTotal,Low, CD163+, pan T cells, CD4+T cells, CD8+T cells, CD56Total,High,Low (NK) cells, and NKT cells, as well as the CD4/CD8 ratio, were significantly higher in CLD subjects. The proportion of T cells (CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8 ratio, NKT cells) and macrophages exhibited a direct association with discomfort score. The percentages of CD45+, CD66bTotal,Low, CD163+, CD3+, CD56Total,High,Low, and NKT cells and cDCD were significantly higher in CLD subjects wearing CL-D. The percentages of CD66bHigh, CD4+T cells, CD8+T cells, NKT cells, and CD4/CD8 ratio were significantly higher in CLD subjects wearing CL-A. Conclusions: Increased proportions of ocular surface immune cells are observed in CLD, and the lens type could impact the immune cells associated with CLD. Translational Relevance: The association between the proportion of altered ocular surface immune cell subsets and contact lens-induced discomfort underpins the importance of considering immune-related aspects during contact lens development and in the clinical management of ocular surface pain.

Indexed as

Contact LensesDry Eye SyndromesConjunctivaCorneaHumansKiller Cells, Natural

Identifiers

PMID35857328
PMCPMC9315072
OpenAlexW4286005422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.