Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35857323›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Development and Validation of a Model for Opioid Prescribing Following Gynecological Surgery.

Isabel V Rodriguez, Paige McKeithan Cisa, Karen Monuszko, Julia Salinaro, Ashraf S Habib, J Eric Jelovsek, Laura J Havrilesky, Brittany Davidson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabel V RodriguezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Paige McKeithan CisaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Karen MonuszkoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Julia SalinaroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Ashraf S HabibDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
J Eric JelovsekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Laura J HavrileskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Brittany DavidsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Overprescription of opioid medications following surgery is well documented. Current prescribing models have been proposed in narrow patient populations, which limits their generalizability. Objective: To develop and validate a model for predicting outpatient opioid use following a range of gynecological surgical procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study, statistical models were explored using data from a training cohort of participants undergoing gynecological surgery for benign and malignant indications enrolled prospectively at a single institution's academic gynecologic oncology practice from February 2018 to March 2019 (cohort 1) and considering 39 candidate predictors of opioid use. Final models were internally validated using a separate testing cohort enrolled from May 2019 to February 2020 (cohort 2). The best final model was updated by combining cohorts, and an online calculator was created. Data analysis was performed from March to May 2020. Exposures: Participants completed a preoperative survey and weekly postoperative assessments (up to 6 weeks) following gynecological surgery. Pain management was at the discretion of clinical practitioners. Main Outcomes and Measures: The response variable used in model development was number of pills used postoperatively, and the primary outcome was model performance using ordinal concordance and Brier score. Results: Data from 382 female adult participants (mean age, 56 years; range, 18-87 years) undergoing gynecological surgery (minimally invasive procedures, 158 patients [73%] in cohort 1 and 118 patients [71%] in cohort 2; open surgical procedures, 58 patients [27%] in cohort 1 and 48 patients [29%] in cohort 2) were included in model development. One hundred forty-seven patients (38%) used 0 pills after hospital discharge, and the mean (SD) number of pills used was 7 (10) (median [IQR], 3 [0-10] pills). The model used 7 predictors: age, educational attainment, smoking history, anticipated pain medication use, anxiety regarding surgery, operative time, and preoperative pregabalin administration. The ordinal concordance was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62-0.68) for predicting 5 or more pills (Brier score, 0.22), 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62-0.68) for predicting 10 or more pills (Brier score, 0.18), and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62-0.68) for predicting 15 or more pills (Brier score, 0.14). Conclusions and Relevance: This model provides individualized estimates of outpatient opioid use following a range of gynecological surgical procedures for benign and malignant indications with all model inputs available at the time of procedure closing. Implementation of this model into the clinical setting is currently ongoing, with plans for additional validation in other surgical populations.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug PrescriptionsGynecologic Surgical ProceduresPostoperative PainAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPain ManagementPractice Patterns, Physicians'Young AdultAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID35857323
PMCPMC9301519
OpenAlexW4286001961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.