Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35857220›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2022

Empirical superior vena cava isolation in patients undergoing repeat catheter ablation procedure after recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

Gelu Simu, Thomas Deneke, Elena Ene, Karin Nentwich, Artur Berkovitz, Kai Sonne, Philipp Halbfass, Eleni Arvaniti, Christian Waechter, Julian Müller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Usefulness of empiric superior vena cava isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Repeat in situ ablation vs. extensive ablation for recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Role of electroanatomical mapping-guided superior vena cava isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients without provoked superior vena cava triggers: a randomized controlled study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Outcomes after redo ablation for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Prospective evaluation of low voltage-guided repeat ablation of atrial fibrillation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: long-term outcomes from a single-centre 10-year experience.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gelu SimuClinic for Interventional Electrophysiology, Heart Centre Bad Neustadt, 97616, Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Germany.
Thomas DenekeClinic for Interventional Electrophysiology, Heart Centre Bad Neustadt, 97616, Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Germany.
Elena EneClinic for Interventional Electrophysiology, Heart Centre Bad Neustadt, 97616, Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Germany.
Karin NentwichClinic for Interventional Electrophysiology, Heart Centre Bad Neustadt, 97616, Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Germany.
Artur BerkovitzClinic for Interventional Electrophysiology, Heart Centre Bad Neustadt, 97616, Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Germany.
Kai SonneClinic for Interventional Electrophysiology, Heart Centre Bad Neustadt, 97616, Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Germany.
Philipp HalbfassClinic for Interventional Electrophysiology, Heart Centre Bad Neustadt, 97616, Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Germany.
Eleni ArvanitiClinic for Interventional Electrophysiology, Heart Centre Bad Neustadt, 97616, Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Germany.
Christian WaechterDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Julian MüllerClinic for Interventional Electrophysiology, Heart Centre Bad Neustadt, 97616, Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Germany. julian.mueller@campus-nes.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8793-3134
Rhön-Klinikum · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the ectopic foci responsible for initiating atrial fibrillation (AF) are usually located in the pulmonary veins (PVs), non-PV sources may initiate AF in approximately 11% of unselected patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. The superior vena cava (SVC) is one of the most frequent non-PV origins for initiating AF. This study aims to investigate the effect of empirical SVC isolation in redo AF ablation procedures.

methodsConsecutive patients undergoing redo AF ablation procedures using a high-power short-duration protocol (HPSD) (50 W; ablation index guided; target AI 350 for posterior wall ablation, AI 450 for anterior wall ablation; CARTO 3 mapping system) were included. Patients with SVC isolation were compared to patients without SVC isolation. Periprocedural parameters and complications were recorded and analyzed. Short-term endpoints included intrahospital AF recurrence, midterm endpoint AF freedom after 3 months, and long-term endpoint AF freedom after 12 months.

resultsA total of 276 patients underwent repeat ablation for recurrent AF (67 ± 10 years; 57% male; 31.5% paroxysmal AF). The patients were divided into two groups: redo procedures with SVC isolation vs redo procedure without SVC isolation. Additional LA substrate modification was done based on intraprocedural voltage maps. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Median procedure time was 85.4 ± 27.1 min with ablation times of 14.0 ± 8.5 min. Intrahospital AF recurrence occurred in 32 patients (12%) with no difference among both groups: 17 patients (13%) SVC vs 15 patients (10%) No-SVC; p = 0.416. At 3-month follow-up, 47 (17%) presented an AF recurrence during the blanking period: 25 patients (19%) SVC vs 22 patients (15%) No-SVC; p = 0.304). After 12 months, 202 (73%) of all patients were in stable sinus rhythm with no significant difference between the two groups: 93 patients (73%) SVC vs 109 patients (74%) No-SVC; p = 0.853). No significant differences were noted when dividing the patients in paroxysmal or persistent AF with and without SVC isolation.

conclusionsIn our series of repeat AF ablation procedures, the addition of empirical SVC isolation to Re-PVI and LA substrate modification did not influence AF recurrence rates. This strategy can however be safe and useful in patients in whom SVC is identified as a trigger of AF.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsFemaleHumansMaleRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeVena Cava, SuperiorAtrial fibrillationEmpiricalHigh-power short-duration ablationPrognosisPulmonary vein isolationRedo ablationSVC isolation

Identifiers

PMID35857220
OpenAlexW4286002090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.