Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35856906›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Comparative Plant Transcriptome Profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 and Camelina sativa var.

Quentin Chesnais, Victor Golyaev, Amandine Velt, Camille Rustenholz, Véronique Brault, Mikhail M Pooggin, Martin Drucker

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Facilitation ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quentin Chesnais *SVQV, UMR1131, INRAE Centre Grand Est-Colmar, Université Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Victor Golyaev *PHIM Plant Health Institute, Université Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Amandine VeltSVQV, UMR1131, INRAE Centre Grand Est-Colmar, Université Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Camille RustenholzSVQV, UMR1131, INRAE Centre Grand Est-Colmar, Université Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Véronique BraultSVQV, UMR1131, INRAE Centre Grand Est-Colmar, Université Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Mikhail M PoogginPHIM Plant Health Institute, Université Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Martin DruckerSVQV, UMR1131, INRAE Centre Grand Est-Colmar, Université Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9765-1189
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence is accumulating that plant viruses alter host plant traits in ways that modify their insect vectors' behavior. These alterations often enhance virus transmission, which has led to the hypothesis that these effects are manipulations caused by viral adaptation. However, we lack a mechanistic understanding of the genetic basis of these indirect, plant-mediated effects on vectors, their dependence on the plant host, and their relation to the mode of virus transmission. Transcriptome profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana and Camelina sativa plants infected with turnip yellows virus (TuYV) or cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) and infested with the common aphid vector Myzus persicae revealed strong virus- and host-specific differences in gene expression patterns. CaMV infection caused more severe effects on the phenotype of both plant hosts than did TuYV infection, and the severity of symptoms correlated strongly with the proportion of differentially expressed genes, especially photosynthesis genes. Accordingly, CaMV infection modified aphid behavior and fecundity more strongly than did infection with TuYV. Overall, infection with CaMV, relying on the noncirculative transmission mode, tends to have effects on metabolic pathways, with strong potential implications for insect vector-plant host interactions (e.g., photosynthesis, jasmonic acid, ethylene, and glucosinolate biosynthetic processes), while TuYV, using the circulative transmission mode, alters these pathways only weakly. These virus-induced deregulations of genes that are related to plant physiology and defense responses might impact both aphid probing and feeding behavior on infected host plants, with potentially distinct effects on virus transmission.

Indexed as

AphidsArabidopsisVirusesAnimalsFeeding BehaviorGene Expression ProfilingPlant Diseasesaphid vectorcaulimovirusfeeding behaviorinsect-plant interactionsplant virusespolerovirusRNA-seqtranscriptome profilingtransmission

Identifiers

PMID35856906
PMCPMC9430646
OpenAlexW4286002137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.