Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35856794›Full record

ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2023

Assessment of Current Practices Across Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers Biorepositories.

Katherine L Lucot, Welver Suarez, Kelsey Mifflin, Charles DeCarli, Jayne La Grande, Brittany N Dugger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuropathology in a diverse cohort of oldest-old: The LifeAfter90 study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Celebrating neuropathology's contributions to Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine L LucotDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5481-6206
Welver SuarezGerontology Program, California State University, Sacramento, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2384-5471
Kelsey MifflinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Charles DeCarliDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Jayne La GrandeDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Brittany N DuggerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

Funding

UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG010129 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DECARLI, CHARLES · 1991 to 2020
$28.3M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG072972 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Charles DeCarli, Rachel A Whitmer · 2021 to 2026
$25.2M
The Neuropathologic Landscape of Alzheimer's Disease in Hispanic DecedentsR01AG062517 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Brittany Nicole Dugger · 2019 to 2026
$10.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010129NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072972NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1984, the National Institute on Aging developed the Alzheimer's disease centers program. The main goal of these centers is to advance the understanding of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) through comprehensive patient evaluations and cutting-edge research in pathology, laboratory medicine, education, and scientific discovery. The neuropathology core of the Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs) collects postmortem brain tissue from consented donors ranging from cognitively normal individuals to those with late-stage dementia, whose samples and data can be shared around the world to further advance knowledge, diagnosis, and to eventually find cures for ADRD. Although recommended guidelines for biorepositories exist, we aimed to understand the current practices within neuropathology cores across the ADRCs. A survey was developed that focused on information related to sample processing methods, biospecimen requests, financial costs related to the repository, and data management. This survey was distributed to 28 current and former ADRC neuropathology cores. The survey obtained a response rate of 82% (23/28). Although most centers were consistent in responses related to sample processing and storage, they varied widely in processes by which neuropathological samples are shared and cost recovery mechanisms. The results of this survey provide benchmark data on practices within neuropathology cores across ADRCs and the overlap with biorepository best practices. Future studies focused on understanding factors that may influence current practices (such as available funds and personnel) are need to aid in minimizing barriers to optimally follow best practices. Sharing these data among ADRCs will allow for improvement in workflows and working toward cures for ADRD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAutopsyBrainHumansAlzheimer's diseasebiobankbiorepositoryneuropathology

Identifiers

PMID35856794
PMCPMC10282793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.