ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2023
Assessment of Current Practices Across Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers Biorepositories.
Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuropathology in a diverse cohort of oldest-old: The LifeAfter90 study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Digital Atlases to Unlock the Potential of Brain Biorepository Tissues for Interdisciplinary Research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Celebrating neuropathology's contributions to Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Toward a generalizable machine learning workflow for neurodegenerative disease staging with focus on neurofibrillary tangles.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2023Article
- Survey of Neuroanatomic Sampling and Staining Procedures in Alzheimer Disease Research Center Brain Banks.Free neuropathology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 1984, the National Institute on Aging developed the Alzheimer's disease centers program. The main goal of these centers is to advance the understanding of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) through comprehensive patient evaluations and cutting-edge research in pathology, laboratory medicine, education, and scientific discovery. The neuropathology core of the Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs) collects postmortem brain tissue from consented donors ranging from cognitively normal individuals to those with late-stage dementia, whose samples and data can be shared around the world to further advance knowledge, diagnosis, and to eventually find cures for ADRD. Although recommended guidelines for biorepositories exist, we aimed to understand the current practices within neuropathology cores across the ADRCs. A survey was developed that focused on information related to sample processing methods, biospecimen requests, financial costs related to the repository, and data management. This survey was distributed to 28 current and former ADRC neuropathology cores. The survey obtained a response rate of 82% (23/28). Although most centers were consistent in responses related to sample processing and storage, they varied widely in processes by which neuropathological samples are shared and cost recovery mechanisms. The results of this survey provide benchmark data on practices within neuropathology cores across ADRCs and the overlap with biorepository best practices. Future studies focused on understanding factors that may influence current practices (such as available funds and personnel) are need to aid in minimizing barriers to optimally follow best practices. Sharing these data among ADRCs will allow for improvement in workflows and working toward cures for ADRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.