Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35856773›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2022

Diabetes self-management: a qualitative study on challenges and solutions from the perspective of South African patients and health care providers.

Tiny Masupe, Sunday Onagbiye, Thandi Puoane, Absetz Pilvikki, Helle Mölsted Alvesson, Peter Delobelle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diabetes knowledge levels among patients in Mhlontlo, South Africa: A quantitative study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Supported self-management in long-term conditions in an African context.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Tiny MasupeDepartment of Family Medicine & Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Sunday OnagbiyeThe Africa Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research (AUTHeR), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4931-007X
Thandi PuoaneSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8871-9260
Absetz PilvikkiCollaborative Care Systems Finland, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1047-909X
Helle Mölsted AlvessonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter DelobelleSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
Collaborative Care Systems Finland · FIKarolinska Institutet · SENorth-West University · ZAUniversity of Botswana · BWUniversity of the Western Cape · ZAVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth education and self-management are among key strategies for managing diabetes and hypertension to reduce morbidity and mortality. Inappropriate self-management support can potentially worsen chronic diseases outcomes if relevant barriers are not identified and self-management solutions are not contextualised. Few studies deliberately solicit suggestions for enhancing self-management from patients and their providers.

objectiveThis qualitative study aimed to unravel experiences, identify self-management barriers, and solicit solutions for enhancing self-management from patients and their healthcare providers.

methodsEight in-depth interviews were conducted with healthcare providers. These were followed by four focus group discussions among patients with type-2- diabetes and or hypertension receiving chronic disease care from two health facilities in a peri-urban township in Cape Town, South Africa. The Self-Management framework described by Lorig and Holman, based on work done by Corbin and Strauss was used to analyse the data.

resultsPatients experienced challenges across all three self-management tasks of behavioural/medical management, role management, and emotional management. Main challenges included poor patient self-control towards lifestyle modification, sub-optimal patient-provider and family partnerships, and post-diagnosis grief-reactions by patients. Barriers experienced were stigma, socio-economic and cultural influences, provider-patient communication gaps, disconnect between facility-based services and patients' lived experiences, and inadequate community care services. Patients suggested empowering community-based solutions to strengthen their disease self-management, including dedicated multidisciplinary diabetes services, counselling services; strengthened family support; patient buddies; patient-led community projects, and advocacy. Providers suggested contextualised communication using audio-visual technologies and patient-centred provider consultations.

conclusionsCommunity-based dedicated multidisciplinary chronic disease healthcare teams, chronic disease counselling services, patient-driven projects and advocacy are needed to improve patient self-management.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypertensionHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchSouth Africabarrierschronic disease caremultidisciplinarypatient-derived solutionsSelf-managementType-2-diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35856773
PMCPMC9307110
OpenAlexW4286206340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.