Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35856710›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

SARS-CoV-2 Convalescent Sera Binding and Neutralizing Antibody Concentrations Compared with COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy Estimates against Symptomatic Infection.

Amy J Schuh, Panayampalli S Satheshkumar, Stephanie Dietz, Lara Bull-Otterson, Myrna Charles, Chris Edens, Jefferson M Jones, Kristina L Bajema, Kristie E N Clarke, L Clifford McDonald and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers in maternal blood, umbilical cord blood, and breast milk.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy J SchuhCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8069-349X
Panayampalli S SatheshkumarCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Stephanie DietzCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Lara Bull-OttersonCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Myrna CharlesCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Chris EdensCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jefferson M JonesCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kristina L BajemaCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kristie E N ClarkeCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
L Clifford McDonaldCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sadhna PatelCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kendra CuffeCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Natalie J ThornburgCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jarad SchifferCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kelly ChunLabcorp, Burlington, North Carolina, USA.
Monique BastidasLabcorp, Burlington, North Carolina, USA.
Manory FernandoLabcorp, Burlington, North Carolina, USA.
Christos J PetropoulosLabcorp, Burlington, North Carolina, USA.
Terri WrinLabcorp, Burlington, North Carolina, USA.
Suqin CaiLabcorp, Burlington, North Carolina, USA.
Dot AdcockLabcorp, Burlington, North Carolina, USA.
Deborah Sesok-PizziniLabcorp, Burlington, North Carolina, USA.
Stanley LetovskyLabcorp, Burlington, North Carolina, USA.
Alicia M FryCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Aron J HallCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Adi V GundlapalliCDC COVID-19 Response, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USLabCorp (United States) · US

Funding

CDC HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (VE) studies have estimated neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations that correlate with protection from symptomatic infection; how these estimates compare to those generated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection is unclear. Here, we assessed quantitative neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations using standardized SARS-CoV-2 assays on 3,067 serum specimens collected during 27 July 2020 to 27 August 2020 from COVID-19-unvaccinated persons with detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations were severalfold lower in the unvaccinated study population compared to published concentrations at 28 days postvaccination. In this convenience sample, ~88% of neutralizing and ~63 to 86% of binding antibody concentrations met or exceeded concentrations associated with 70% COVID-19 VE against symptomatic infection; ~30% of neutralizing and 1 to 14% of binding antibody concentrations met or exceeded concentrations associated with 90% COVID-19 VE. Our study not only supports observations of infection-induced immunity and current recommendations for vaccination postinfection to maximize protection against COVID-19, but also provides a large data set of pre-COVID-19 vaccination anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations that will serve as an important comparator in the current setting of vaccine-induced and hybrid immunity. As new SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge and displace circulating virus strains, we recommend that standardized binding antibody assays that include spike protein-based antigens be utilized to estimate antibody concentrations correlated with protection from COVID-19. These estimates will be helpful in informing public health guidance, such as the need for additional COVID-19 vaccine booster doses to prevent symptomatic infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 SerotherapyCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunization, PassiveImmunization, SecondaryVaccine EfficacyAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 Vaccinesantibodyanti-SARS-CoV-2correlate of protectioncorrelationCOVID-19IgGimmuneimmunityneutralizing antibodiesprotectionquantitativeSARS-CoV-2standardized

Identifiers

PMID35856710
PMCPMC9430572
OpenAlexW4286001289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.