Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35856325›Full record

ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2024

Epidemiology of Distal Forearm Fracture: A Population-Based Study of 5426 Fractures.

Soeren Soerensen, Peter Larsen, Lærke R Korup, Adriano A Ceccotti, Mia B Larsen, Jonas T Filtenborg, Karen P Weighert, Rasmus Elsoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Epidemiology of forearm fractures in women and men in Norway 2008-2019.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soeren SoerensenAalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Peter LarsenAalborg University Hospital, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8094-4463
Lærke R KorupAalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Adriano A CeccottiAalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Mia B LarsenAalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Jonas T FiltenborgAalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Karen P WeighertAalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Rasmus ElsoeAalborg University Hospital, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5781-5604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite intensive research into the epidemiology of adult distal forearm fractures, the literature is limited. This study aimed to provide a full overview of adult distal forearm fracture epidemiology, including incidence, fracture classification, mode of injury, and trauma mechanism in patients sustaining a distal forearm fracture, based on an accurate at-risk population with manually validated data leading to a high quality in data.

methodsThis was a population-based cohort study with a manual review of X-rays and charts. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of adult distal forearm fractures. The study was based on an average at-risk population of 522 607 citizens. A total of 5426 adult distal forearm fractures were included during the study period. Females accounted for 4199 (77%) and males accounted for 1227 (23%) of fractures.

resultsThe overall incidence of adult distal forearm fractures was 207.7/100 000/year. Female incidence was 323.4/100 000/year, and male incidence was 93.3/100 000/year. A marked increase in incidence with increasing age was observed for females after 50 years of age. The incidence of distal radius fractures was 203.0/100 000/year, and the incidence of isolated ulna fractures was 3.8/100 000/year. The most common fracture type was an extra-articular AO type 2R3A (69%), and the most common mode of injury was a fall from own height (76%). A small non-trending year-to-year variation was observed during the 5-year study period.

conclusionResults show that adult distal forearm fractures are very common in women after the postmenopausal period. The overall incidence of adult distal forearm fractures was 207.8/100 000/year. Female incidence was 323.4/100 000/year.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneUlna FracturesWrist FracturesAccidental FallsAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Ageddiagnosisdistal forearmepidemiologyforearmfracture/dislocationincidenceresearch & health outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35856325
PMCPMC10786118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.